Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1315 new people
  • 107 new organizations
  • 1149 new photos
  • 1999 job history records for people in our database
  • 713 education records for people in our database
  • 3184 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 1 new person through the revolving door
  • 132 new policy reports
  • 15 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 356 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9208 new press releases
  • 5 new town halls
  • 37 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Contractor Overhead Costs: Money Saving Reviews Are Not Being Done As Directed

  Premium   Download PDF Now (12 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Aug. 3, 1994
Report No. NSIAD-94-205
Subject
Summary:

Should-cost reviews are a special form of cost analysis used to evaluate the economy and efficiency of a contractor's overhead operations. Since being told in 1992 to conduct more should-cost reviews, the Defense Department has only done four of them. Furthermore, all four were done by the Air Force rather than the Defense Contract Management Command, the organization primarily responsible for conducting the reviews. Since 1992, the Command has acknowledged the importance of reviews but has not begun any because of the time involved in developing regulations and an approach for performing those reviews. In June 1993, it asked its customers to identify potential candidates for should-cost reviews; they listed 17 candidates. The Command plans to begin one should-cost review in July 1994 and another one after a contractor completes a restructuring action. The Command did not consider the other 15 good candidates for should-cost reviews because of steps these contractors have taken to cut overhead costs.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com