Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1315 new people
  • 107 new organizations
  • 1149 new photos
  • 1999 job history records for people in our database
  • 713 education records for people in our database
  • 3184 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 1 new person through the revolving door
  • 132 new policy reports
  • 15 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 356 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9208 new press releases
  • 5 new town halls
  • 37 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Improvements Needed in Review of Public Land Withdrawals: Land Set Aside for Special Purposes

  Premium   Download PDF Now (34 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Nov. 16, 1976
Report No. CED-76-159
Subject
Summary:

The Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management procedures for reviewing and revoking public land withdrawals are described, and, in particular, public lands withdrawn in the State of California are reviewed. The Secretary of the Interior and the Administrator of General Services have responsibility for reviewing the status of certain withdrawn lands. The Secretary of the Interior delegated his authority to the Bureau of Land Management.

In California the Bureau had not established a comprehensive program to review land withdrawals primarily under its jurisdiction. In many cases a review was not made, or, if made, it was limited to identifying withdrawals, rather than determining whether any were obsolete and should be revoked. The Bureau and the General Services Administration had overlapping responsibilities for reviewing withdrawals--primarily concerning those for military purposes. The Bureau had not processed revocation applications submitted to it by other agencies in a timely manner so that the land withdrawn could be returned to the public land inventory.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com