Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1739 new people
  • 124 new organizations
  • 991 new photos
  • 2117 job history records for people in our database
  • 641 education records for people in our database
  • 2487 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 107 new policy reports
  • 3 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 323 new personal financial disclosures
  • 6604 new press releases
  • 1 new town hall
  • 28 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Future of the Penny: Options for Congressional Consideration

  Premium   Download PDF Now (21 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date July 16, 1996
Report No. T-GGD-96-153
Subject
Summary:

In reviewing whether the United States should continue to produce the penny, GAO found that several factors, including government costs, public attitudes, budgetary and operational consequences for the Mint and its contractors, and the fairness of rounding prices to the nearest 5-cent increment, warrant congressional consideration. Among key findings, GAO found that although it costs less than a penny to mint a penny, the government in 1994 lost between $8 million and $9 million after costs involved in distributing pennies were taken into account. Public opinion on the penny is mixed: a GAO poll found that most Americans prefer rounding to using pennies, but a similar number believe that the penny is useful and should be retained.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com