Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Federal Personnel: Review of Evaluation of Personnel Demonstration Project at Commerce

  Premium   Download PDF Now (18 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date May 14, 1991
Report No. GGD-91-93
Subject
Summary:

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) contractor's evaluation of the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) personnel management demonstration project to hire and retain capable employees.

GAO found that the evaluation of the NIST project's first 2 years was not sound, since: (1) although the contractor's proposed evaluation scheme was sound, it did not properly implement the intended research design; (2) the contractor did not convincingly demonstrate the appropriateness of proposed comparison groups; (3) the contractor did not base its evaluation conclusions on preproject data; (4) changing conditions at NIST could affect evaluation findings by producing effects that might be misinterpreted as project effects; (5) the evaluation design lacked an adequate analysis plan; (6) OPM funding was insufficient to permit adequate staffing for the evaluation; and (7) the contractor gave no priority to collecting and analyzing information regarding nonproject changes.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com