Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1563 new people
  • 132 new organizations
  • 575 new photos
  • 1986 job history records for people in our database
  • 516 education records for people in our database
  • 1689 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 8 new people through the revolving door
  • 103 new policy reports
  • 16 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 330 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9310 new press releases
  • 12 new town halls
  • 19 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Defense Budget: Potential Reductions to DOD's Ammunition Budgets

  Premium   Download PDF Now (52 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Sept. 17, 1990
Report No. NSIAD-90-256
Subject
Summary:

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the military services' fiscal year (FY) 1991 budget requests for ammunition items and the Army's request for ammunition production base support.

GAO found that the: (1) services did not justify $424 million of their $2.2-billion FY 1991 ammunition requests; (2) Army overstated its $1.2-billion FY 1991 request by $343.3 million; (3) Army adequately supported its request for modernizing and expanding the ammunition production base; (4) Army did not need $88,000 of its FY 1989 appropriation and $48.9 million of its FY 1990 appropriation, since it decided not to buy two items; (5) Navy overstated $19.6 million of its $345.7-million FY 1991 budget request and did not need $1 million of its FY 1990 appropriation due to an item's reduced unit cost; (6) Air Force overstated its $417.6-million FY 1991 request by $62.6 million; and (7) Marine Corps did not need $8.5 million of its $284.7-million FY 1991 request, but could use $2.3 million of the unneeded funds to procure two items that were in short supply.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com