Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1563 new people
  • 132 new organizations
  • 575 new photos
  • 1986 job history records for people in our database
  • 516 education records for people in our database
  • 1689 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 8 new people through the revolving door
  • 103 new policy reports
  • 16 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 330 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9310 new press releases
  • 12 new town halls
  • 19 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

GSA Regional Reorganization: Public Buildings Service Consolidation Followed Reasonable Process

  Premium   Download PDF Now (20 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Jan. 6, 1988
Report No. GGD-88-21
Subject
Summary:

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the General Services Administration's (GSA) management decisionmaking process to determine whether its reorganization of its Public Buildings Service offices in Denver and Fort Worth was reasonable.

GAO found that: (1) GSA based its decision to consolidate functions on the assumption that it would have to reduce staff because of anticipated budget constraints and its policy to increase efficiency by reducing overhead; (2) GSA produced numerous studies of various reorganizational options, including a major organizational consolidation of West Coast GSA and Service operations; (3) the Fort Worth Regional Administrator developed a plan to consolidate the Fort Worth and Denver functions, which GSA supplemented with work-load and financial analyses; (4) the Denver Regional Administrator participated in various reorganizational meetings and the final meeting that produced the transfer agreement; and (5) although the GSA decisionmaking process appeared reasonable, the decision was not necessarily the most reasonable or appropriate alternative.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com