Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Justice and Law Enforcement: Better Management Can Ease Federal Case Backlog

  Premium   Download PDF Now (72 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Feb. 24, 1981
Report No. GGD-81-2
Subject
Summary:

Actions necessary to deal with the civil case backlog in federal district courts were discussed. Processing a large volume of cases requires the development and enforcement of a case management system, the use of magistrates and clerks' offices, and an adequate number of judges. GAO found that the degree to which the courts experienced a backlog problem correlated with the extent to which these key requirements were satisfied. Improved court administration would minimize this problem.

Courts were not taking full advantage of magistrates or personnel from the clerks' offices to assist in processing civil cases. Courts and judges that used the clerks' offices for administering case management and docket control systems had fewer backlog cases. Many judges were unwilling to assign civil case duties to the magistrates because they: (1) believed that magistrates do not expedite the civil process since their decisions can be appealed to the court; (2) wanted full control of all cases; and (3) believed that the opportunities for settlement were greater if they presided over all conferences.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com