Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1315 new people
  • 107 new organizations
  • 1149 new photos
  • 1999 job history records for people in our database
  • 713 education records for people in our database
  • 3184 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 1 new person through the revolving door
  • 132 new policy reports
  • 15 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 356 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9208 new press releases
  • 5 new town halls
  • 37 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Government Operations: Reserve Components and National Guard Recruiting

  Premium   Download PDF Now (3 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Aug. 12, 1977
Report No. FPCD-77-68
Subject
Summary:

During a survey of the recruitment practices of the military services for Reserve and National Guard personnel, several potential problems were noted.

There are significant differences in the policies and procedures that each reserve component uses in recruiter selection criteria, deployment, length of training and topic coverage, and utilization. The Reserves appear to be coordinating their recruiting advertising programs with the active forces, but the Guard components are acting independently. The effectiveness of advertising was questioned in a previous GAO report. The capability of the existing management to implement expanded recruitment programs will determine whether the desired results are achieved. Consideration should be given to analyzing the cost benefits and effectiveness of trends towards a nonprior service program compared with maximizing the potential of prior service personnel. Various service enlistment options should be studied. A change in assumptions about the eligible male population could change the recruiting emphasis and should be studied.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com