Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Transportation: Comparison of States' Highway Construction Costs

  Premium   Download PDF Now (27 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Nov. 3, 2003
Report No. GAO-04-113R
Subject
Summary:

We are reporting to Congress on whether Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) data can help transportation stakeholders understand how states' costs to build, reconstruct, and maintain federally financed highways, roads, and bridges (termed "constructing highways" for this report) compare. Durig our review, we became aware of significant issues regarding the quality of the data that FHWA collects and reports, a topic also discussed in this report.

FHWA's database allows for comparisons of an individual state's costs over time but does not allow for comparisons between states. In addition, FHWA has concerns, which have not been formally disclosed to users, about the quality of the data. FHWA's database containing its bid price data allows for comparisons of an individual state's costs over time but does not allow for comparisons between states. Costs are tracked by state, according to an index value that is assigned quarterly. Each state received an index value of 100 for the base year (1987). If one state's costs in the base year were twice those of another state, both would have an index value of 100 for that year, and the difference in those costs would not be shown, thus preventing a comparison. In addition, FHWA officials told us that the bid price data do not contain details to determine why costs appear to differ either between states or within a state. They told us that the installed cost of materials could vary significantly, for example, because the quality of the materials or the installation specification (e.g., smoothness of the surface) could be very different. FHWA's bid price data do not contain this information. FHWA is considering whether to discontinue collecting bid price data because of the (1) apparent limited use of the data, and (2) level of effort to collect data that apparently is not extensively used. In commenting on a draft of this report, FHWA noted that it hired a consultant to evaluate the usefulness of the data to stakeholders and to explore potential alternative approaches to gathering information that could be used within FHWA. FHWA also commented that it recently partnered with the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials to survey all state departments of transportation on the extent of use of the published price trend data and alternative ways that FHWA could gather these data (such as using data that are being collected by states for their internal use). We contacted 12 states, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, and several industry associations about the usefulness of the bid price data. Generally, they told us they do not use the data. For example, a few states told us that they maintain more complete data, and FHWA's data are not compatible with their own. FHWA estimated that it takes states, in total, about 975 hours annually to report the bid price data (based on reporting by 37 states), or an average of about 6.5 hours per state per quarterly report.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports