Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Defense Depot Maintenance: Privatization and the Debate Over the Public-Private Mix

  Premium   Download PDF Now (25 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date April 16, 1996
Report No. T-NSIAD-96-146
Subject
Summary:

The Pentagon's policy of shifting depot maintenance workloads to the private sector is unlikely to generate expected savings and could worsen excess capacity problems at underused repair facilities. Meanwhile, the Defense Department (DOD) could save $182 million annually by closing rather than privatizing-in-place the Sacramento and San Antonio Air Logistics Centers. This testimony is a preliminary analysis of DOD's March 1996 report, mandated by Congress, on the military's comprehensive depot maintenance policy. GAO also addresses the allocation of the depot maintenance workload between the public and the private sectors, including ongoing privatization initiatives, such as privatization-in-place. GAO discusses (1) DOD's depot maintenance management model in the post-Cold War era, (2) the extent to which DOD's proposed depot maintenance policy is consistent with congressional direction and guidance, (3) the savings that DOD is anticipating from privatization of depot maintenance activities, and (4) the cost-effectiveness of privatization-in-place as an alternative to closing depots.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com