Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Employment: Reassignment of Two NIH Employees

  Premium   Download PDF Now (8 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date July 5, 1995
Report No. OSI-95-14R
Subject
Summary:

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the: (1) reassignments of two National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) employees, focusing on the actions of Health and Human Services (HHS) officials; and (2) University of Wisconsin-Madison's handling of scientific misconduct charges against two of its professors. GAO noted that: (1) there was no evidence that HHS improperly handled the reassignments or that HHS officials pressured NIDDK staff to reassign the two employees; (2) the reassignments resulted from the shift of responsibility for investigating allegations of scientific misconduct; (3) there was no evidence that the NIDDK employees' reassignments were in reprisal for public statements that they had made; (4) the charges of scientific misconduct against the two university professors arose during a pharmaceutical research company's law suit against the University; (5) there was no evidence that the University's investigation, conducted in accordance with state law, was not thorough and objective; and (6) the University reasonably concluded that no misconduct occurred.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com