Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1865 new people
  • 34 new organizations
  • 622 new photos
  • 1247 job history records for people in our database
  • 518 education records for people in our database
  • 2209 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 198 new policy reports
  • 12 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 921 new personal financial disclosures
  • 27459 new press releases
  • 30 new town halls

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Navy Shipbuilding Programs: Nuclear Attack Submarine Requirements

  Premium   Download PDF Now (16 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date March 16, 1995
Report No. T-NSIAD-95-120
Subject
Summary:

There are less costly alternatives than the Navy's approach to maintain the required fleet of nuclear attack submarines. These alternatives would save billions of dollars and meet the Navy's force structure and threat requirements. In addition, the SSN-23 is not needed to satisfy force structure requirements or to counter a threat. Instead, the Defense Department's (DOD) justification for building the submarine is to preserve competition and to meet industrial base and national security needs. GAO believes that this is an inadequate justification for building the SSN-23 because currently no competition exists to build nuclear attack submarines and DOD has not made clear what it means by long-term industrial base and national security needs.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com