Summary: Male and female cadets differed in some of their experiences at the U.S. Military Academy. For example, women consistently received offers of admission at higher rates than men, but also consistently experienced higher attrition than men. Women's academic grades were lower than men's, particularly during freshman and sophomore years, despite generally higher academic predictor scores. In contrast, women's physical education grades were somewhat higher despite lower predictor scores in this area. Although reviewed more frequently for Honor Code violations and for failure to meet academic standards, women were recommended for separation less often. Although minorities had higher admission rates than did whites, they had lower academic predictor scores and lower academic, physical education, and military grades. As a result, minorities were more frequently reviewed for serious failure to meet academic standards and fewer minorities graduated in the top quarter of their class. Minorities were also reviewed at higher rates than whites for Honor Code infractions and were recommended for separation for honor reasons at generally higher rates than whites. A GAO survey of cadets, staff, and faculty revealed perceptions that women and minorities were generally treated the same as men and whites. Some male cadets, however, viewed women as receiving better treatment in some areas. To a somewhat lesser degree, minorities were also viewed as receiving better treatment.
