Endangered Species: Public Comments Received on Proposed Listings

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

1865 new people
34 new organizations
622 new photos
1247 job history records for people in our database
518 education records for people in our database
2209 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
198 new policy reports
12 new trips to our privately funded travel database
921 new personal financial disclosures
27459 new press releases
30 new town halls

Caught Our Eye Rss

GOP is center stage and talk of the town halls

by Sean McGlinn on 12/20/2024
Congressional trips highlight coastal charm

by Sean McGlinn on 12/18/2024
House female staffers poised to widen historic wage gap

by Caleb Mynatt on 12/16/2024
Landing on the Hill after a mission with NASA

by Sean McGlinn on 12/13/2024
Incoming House Republican recruits new comms director

by Sean McGlinn on 12/11/2024

» More from Caught Our Eye

Follow @LegiStorm

LegiStorm adds House Q2 salaries and expenses

2024-09-05
Latest Senate salary and expense records published

2024-06-10
LegiStorm adds House Q1 salaries and expenses

2024-06-05
LegiStorm adds Q4 salary analytics and turnover data

2024-03-14

» More from our DevBlog

Spartz to boycott committees, GOP caucus

by Indiana Capital Chronicle on 12/17/2024
New jobs that caught our eye

by Axios on 12/06/2024
LegiStorm rebuffs Wohl and Burkman’s AI lobbying software

by Politico on 11/26/2024

Premium Download PDF Now (28 pages)

Report Type	Reports and Testimonies
Report Date	Sept. 30, 1993
Report No.	RCED-93-220BR
Subject	Endangered species Environment evaluation Data collection Environmental law Environmental policies Public opinion polls Public relations Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Environmental impact statements

Summary:

One issue likely to be debated during the reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act is whether a scientific peer review is needed of decisions to list species as endangered and threatened under the act. The act requires that these decisions be based on the best available scientific and commercial data, and peer review has been suggested as a way to ensure this. This briefing report provides information on the public comments that were provided in response to species' being proposed for listing, the extent and nature of questions raised about the biological basis for the proposed listings, and the frequency of public hearings on proposed listings. GAO also discusses the number of petitions to list, delist, or reclassify species that the Fish and Wildlife Service found not merited.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

Weekly Updates

Caught Our Eye Rss

Social Media

DevBlog Rss

In the News

Endangered Species: Public Comments Received on Proposed Listings