Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1563 new people
  • 132 new organizations
  • 575 new photos
  • 1986 job history records for people in our database
  • 516 education records for people in our database
  • 1689 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 8 new people through the revolving door
  • 103 new policy reports
  • 16 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 330 new personal financial disclosures
  • 9310 new press releases
  • 12 new town halls
  • 19 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Conservation Reserve Program: Cost-Effectiveness Is Uncertain

  Premium   Download PDF Now (18 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date March 26, 1993
Report No. RCED-93-132
Subject
Summary:

Under the Conservation Reserve Program, the Agriculture Department will spend nearly $20 billion between fiscal years 1987 and 2003 to temporarily remove 36.5 million acres of cropland from production. GAO concludes that the program is an expensive way to reduce environmental problems, such as erosion, linked to agriculture production. Little is known about the dollar value of the environmental benefits purchased or about the extent to which removing the land from production will alleviate environmental problems. Furthermore, the program postpones rather than resolves these problems, and additional costs may be incurred to maintain the program's objectives when the contracts expire. Other Agriculture Department conservation initiatives use less costly strategies to achieve lasting environmental objectives; unlike the Conservation Reserve Program, however, these other programs are not intended to curb excess production, and they only indirectly support farmers' incomes.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com