Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Dislocated Workers: Comparison of Assistance Programs

  Premium   Download PDF Now (42 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Sept. 10, 1992
Report No. HRD-92-153BR
Subject
Summary:

This briefing report provides information on services available to dislocated workers under the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and the Economic Dislocation and Worker Adjustment Assistance (EDWAA) programs. This topic is particularly timely because the North American Free Trade Agreement has fueled concerns about further job losses and about the government's role in helping workers make a smooth transition to new employment. GAO found it difficult to gather basic information on both programs because the Department of Labor does not keep comprehensive, reliable information on program implementation and results. Despite such limitations, GAO found enough information to identify several significant differences between the two programs in the three states it visited--Michigan, New Jersey, and Texas. TAA served a larger proportion of harder-to-place persons and TAA participants received more income support and were more likely to enter longer-term training. Both programs were slow to provide training and neither had comprehensive data on how participants fared after completing the programs. Both programs provided classroom training, but EDWAA supplemented this with on-the-job training. In addition, local areas differed widely in how much they coordinated TAA and EDWAA services. Although officials at the state level coordinated with one another, they and local officials acknowledged that little coordination exists between program staff in many local areas. GAO summarized this report in testimony before Congress; see: Dislocated Workers: Comparison of Programs, by Linda G. Morra, Director of Education and Employment Issues, before the Senate Committee on Finance. GAO/T-HRD-92-57, Sept. 10, 1992 (seven pages).

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports