Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Maternal and Child Health: Block Grant Funds Should Be Distributed More Equitably

  Premium   Download PDF Now (90 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date April 2, 1992
Report No. HRD-92-5
Subject
Summary:

Low- and moderate-income expectant mothers, their infants, and children with special health care needs are the intended beneficiaries of Maternal and Child Health Services block grants. This important federal program helps states deliver basic health care services, like prenatal and postpartum care, to those who might otherwise do without. GAO examined the current formula under which program funding--$453 million in fiscal year 1990--is allocated among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Its recommendation is that Congress adopt a formula that distributes state funding according to the following three factors: concentration of children at risk, costs of providing health care services, and states' ability to finance maternal and child health services. In redesigning the formula, however, Congress will need to strike a balance between equity for beneficiaries and state taxpayers. GAO's weighing of these two concerns in its example of a new allocation formula shows one way Congress' preferences could be implemented.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com