Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Defense Management: Stronger Oversight of Joint Service Imagery Processing System Needed

  Premium   Download PDF Now (38 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date July 26, 1991
Report No. NSIAD-91-164
Subject
Summary:

GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) management of the Joint Service Imagery Processing System (JSIPS), focusing on whether: (1) the JSIPS program kept to original cost, schedule, and performance estimates; (2) DOD and the services fully considered user requirements in JSIPS design, development, and planned testing; (3) JSIPS program decisions were appropriately coordinated with closely related imagery programs; and (4) DOD exercised adequate oversight of program activities.

GAO found that: (1) JSIPS cost, schedule, and performance estimates changed significantly, causing a funding shortfall of $38 million and resulting in a restructuring of the contract; (2) JSIPS design and development efforts supported the individual services' needs rather than joint operations requirements; (3) the new contract reduced the number of JSIPS units to be delivered under full-scale development from three to two, delayed the planned delivery of the second JSIPS unit by 18 months, and voided the negotiated prices of production options in the original contract; (4) JSIPS design, development, test plans, and production schedules are not coordinated with closely related systems that will gather and transmit data for JSIPS; (5) the Office of the Secretary of Defense has not developed an integrated test plan and production schedule that would be binding on the individual services and would prevent the uncoordinated fielding of mutually supporting systems; and (6) top-level DOD officials have not received adequate and independent information to address such JSIPS problems as funding shortfalls, the failure to emphasize joint requirements, poor coordination with related systems, and inadequate management oversight.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports