Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Internal Affairs Investigations: Customs Service Needs to Better Manage the Investigation Process

  Premium   Download PDF Now (14 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Feb. 28, 1989
Report No. GGD-89-43
Subject
Summary:

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Customs Service Office of Internal Affairs' policies and procedures for handling allegations of employee impropriety and employee background investigations.

GAO found that: (1) the Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General (OIG) was responsible for ensuring that Internal Affairs complied with established policies and procedures; (2) although procedures required documentation for each allegation Internal Affairs received, it did not document an allegation if the investigator determined that the allegation was nonspecific, incomplete, or frivolous; (3) lack of documentation precluded any assessment of the extent to which allegations went undocumented, the seriousness of the allegations, or the extent to which Internal Affairs notified OIG of direct allegations from individuals; (4) some documentation indicated that Internal Affairs failed to notify OIG of allegations involving senior officials; and (5) 27 of 41 cases completed prior to 1987 procedural changes were missing required documentation, while only 6 of 20 1988 cases were missing required documentation. GAO also found that: (1) Internal Affairs did 6,421 background investigations in 1987 and 5,690 in 1988, compared to 2,534 in 1986; (2) although a backlog of new employee investigations developed in 1987, Internal Affairs eliminated it by using overtime, modified procedures, and additional staffing; and (3) in 1988, Internal Affairs continued to have a backlog of between 3,500 and 5,500 employee reinvestigations, resulting from its practice of only completing reinvestigations on promoted or reassigned employees. In addition, GAO found that: (1) OIG had not done a complete quality assurance review of Internal Affairs since 1980; and (2) OIG relied on periodic meetings and case reviews to ensure the quality of Internal Affairs investigations.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports