Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 376 new people
  • 171 new organizations
  • 408 new photos
  • 1234 job history records for people in our database
  • 653 education records for people in our database
  • 1467 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 3 new people through the revolving door
  • 109 new policy reports
  • 43 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 629 new personal financial disclosures
  • 15148 new press releases
  • 11 new town halls
  • 25 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Supplemental Food Program: Savings From Food Purchases Could Increase WIC Participation

  Premium   Download PDF Now (24 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date July 25, 1988
Report No. RCED-88-183BR
Subject
Summary:

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the number of additional eligible participants that states could serve through the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) if they adopted competitive bidding or rebate methods to purchase food items other than infant formula.

GAO reviewed Maryland and Ohio cost-savings methods and found that: (1) if Maryland's reported savings of 2 percent were duplicated nationally, this would equal about $18.5 million in savings, which could finance about 46,000 additional WIC participants; and (2) Ohio's reported 14-percent savings rate, which would equal about $129.4 million nationally could finance about 321,900 additional participants. GAO also found that the two states: (1) provided food to WIC participants through retail purchase and home delivery; and (2) had contracted for the home delivery portion of their distribution systems, which is where potential savings existed.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports

HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com