Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Disability Programs: SSA Consultative Medical Examination Process Improved; Some Problems Remain

  Premium   Download PDF Now (58 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Dec. 10, 1985
Report No. HRD-86-23
Subject
Summary:

In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Social Security Administration's (SSA) management of consultative examinations (CE) in its disability programs. GAO evaluated: (1) SSA ability to ensure the quality and reliability of examinations and reports; (2) SSA controls to ensure the necessity and appropriateness of CE purchases; and (3) the operations of major volume providers nationwide.

Disability decisions are made by state disability determination services (DDS), which are regulated by SSA regional offices. If a claimant's treating physician is unavailable to provide evidence of medical impairment, CE are purchased from private medical sources. GAO found that: (1) increased SSA claims documentation requirements, emphasis on decisional accuracy, and continuing investigations of persons already receiving disability benefits increased the rate of CE purchasing; (2) as the demand for CE grew, states would purchase them from volume providers; (3) there were few substantive problems in on-site reviews of volume providers by state and federal teams; (4) SSA required states to establish CE management plans with oversight by SSA regional offices; (5) new SSA policies have provided better direction on physician standards and CE reporting requirements; and (6) states have increased their monitoring of CE providers. GAO also found that: (1) SSA did not specify how the states should structure their management systems to control the CE process; (2) SSA still lacks reasonable assurance that it obtains good quality medical examinations and reports and prevents the purchase of unnecessary examinations; and (3) some SSA regional offices have not reviewed their states' implementation plans and are not performing monitoring activities as SSA requires.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports