Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

An Overview of the WIN Program: Its Objectives, Accomplishments, and Problems

  Premium   Download PDF Now (70 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date June 21, 1982
Report No. HRD-82-55
Subject
Summary:

In response to a congressional request, GAO assessed the Work Incentive Program (WIN) to determine: (1) what portion of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) population receives assistance from WIN; (2) what percentage of WIN participants achieve self-support; (3) whether other WIN performance goals are being achieved; and (4) what mix of services is being provided to WIN participants and to what extent those services and other factors are associated with participant outcomes.

Because of budget limitations and legal exemptions from the WIN program, less than 20 percent of adult AFDC recipients participated in the program in 1980. Over 60 percent of adult AFDC recipients were legally exempt from registering for WIN because they were caring for children under 6 years of age. Because of limited funding and a premium put on the number of recipients obtaining jobs, regardless of the help provided, WIN assisted those AFDC recipients who were easiest to place. Other recipients who registered generally did not get help. For fiscal year (FY) 1980, about 70 percent of the WIN registrants who entered employment said that they found their own work. Half of those who entered employment said that the program contributed to their finding a job. Slightly more than one-third of the AFDC recipients who were also WIN participants entered employment during 1980, and less than half of those were able to go off AFDC on the strength of their earnings. Because of the practice of counting twice individuals entering more than one job in a year and the use of unrealistic retention levels, GAO estimated that the reported FY 1980 saving from AFDC grant reductions of $632 million was overstated by $319 million. In addition, reported savings did not separate savings resulting from self-placements from those resulting from WIN placements.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports