LegiStorm

Summary:
What GAO Found

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) organizational change management activities for the Electronic Health Record Modernization (EHRM) program were partially consistent with seven leading practices and not consistent with one leading practice (see table).

Extent to Which the Electronic Health Record Modernization (EHRM) Program's Activities Were Consistent with Organizational Change Management Leading Practices


Leading practice


GAO assessment


Developing a vision for change


Partially consistent


Identifying and managing stakeholders


Partially consistent


Communicating effectively


Partially consistent


Assessing the readiness for change


Partially consistent


Increasing workforce skills and competencies


Not consistent


Identifying and addressing potential barriers to change


Partially consistent


Establishing targets and metrics for change


Partially consistent


Assessing the results of change


Partially consistent

Source: GAO analysis of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) data. | GAO-23-106731

Until the program fully implements the leading practices for change management, future deployments risk continuing change management challenges that can hinder effective use of the new electronic health record (EHR) system.

Most users have expressed dissatisfaction with the new system. VA's 2021 and 2022 surveys showed that users were not satisfied with the system's performance or training. About 79 percent (1,640 of 2,066) of users disagreed or strongly disagreed that the system enabled quality care. In addition, about 89 percent (1,852 of 2,074) of users disagreed or strongly disagreed that the system made them as efficient as possible. Further, VA has not established targets (i.e., goals) to assess user satisfaction. Until it does so, VA lacks a basis for determining when satisfaction has sufficiently improved for the system to be deployed at additional sites. Such a basis helps ensure that the system is not deployed prematurely, which could risk patients' safety.

VA did not adequately identify and address system issues. Specifically, VA did not ensure that trouble tickets for the new EHR system were resolved within timeliness goals. It subsequently worked with the contractor to reduce the number of tickets that were over 45 days old. Nevertheless, the overall number of open tickets has steadily increased since 2020. Accordingly, it is critical that system issues be resolved in a timely manner. Additionally, although VA has assessed the system's performance at two sites, as of January 2023, it had not conducted an independent operational assessment, as originally planned and consistent with leading practices for software verification and validation. Without such an independent assessment, VA will be limited in its ability to (1) validate that the system is operationally suitable and effective, and (2) identify, track, and resolve key operational issues.

In April 2023, VA announced that it planned to halt future deployments of the new EHR system to focus on making improvements at the five sites currently using the system.

Why GAO Did This Study

VA uses the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VistA), which includes the department's legacy EHR system, to manage health care for its patients. VistA is technically complex, costly to maintain, and does not fully support the need to exchange health data with other organizations. In June 2017, VA initiated the EHRM program to replace VistA.

Congressional report language associated with the VA appropriations for fiscal years 2020 through 2022 contained provisions for GAO to review VA's EHR deployment. GAO's objectives were to determine the extent to which VA has (1) followed leading organizational change management practices for the EHRM program, (2) assessed satisfaction with the new system, and (3) identified and addressed EHR system issues. GAO identified leading change management practices and evaluated VA's activities against these practices. It also reviewed the results of surveys that VA conducted to determine users' satisfaction with the new EHR, conducted interviews with selected users, and interviewed officials on user satisfaction goals. Further, GAO analyzed VA's data on the contractor's performance meeting time frames for addressing system trouble tickets.