Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Income Security: States' Efforts To Detect Duplicate Public Assistance Payments

  Premium   Download PDF Now (24 pages)
Report Type Reports and Testimonies
Report Date Sept. 17, 1981
Report No. HRD-81-133
Subject
Summary:

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO obtained information concerning the efforts of the States to make comparisons of their public assistance rolls for the detection of duplicate payments. GAO also analyzed the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program in four States to determine the extent to which undetected duplicate enrollments and payments occurred in these States.

GAO sent questionnaires to the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands and received responses from all of them. The replies indicated that about half of the States had made efforts to compare their public assistance rolls on an intrastate basis for identification of duplicate payments. Because the frequency, thoroughness, and amount of available information on the results of these efforts varied significantly from State to State, GAO was unable to draw an overall conclusion on the success of these efforts in identifying duplicate payments. The GAO analysis of all 1979 AFDC cases in the four States selected indicated that duplicate enrollments existed which may have resulted in undetected duplicate payments. Because of the number of cases identified, GAO did not determine how many actually involved duplicate payments, but provided the Health and Human Services (HHS) Inspector General with lists of these cases for detailed investigation and resolution. Further, the ability to identify the amount of AFDC duplication was hampered by invalid and missing information in the four States' AFDC computerized beneficiary records. Most of the data element errors that were found dealt with invalid social security numbers which could disguise duplicate enrollments and hinder their identification. Conversely, AFDC cases having identical beneficiary social security numbers could give the appearance of duplication when in fact two different people may be involved.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports