Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Intelligence Collection Platforms: Satellites, Manned Aircraft, and UAVs (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (30 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date May 21, 1998
Report Number 98-495
Report Type Report
Authors Michael F. Miller and Richard A. Best, Jr., Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

Imagery--photographs or electro-optical transmissions similar to television--is a key component of contemporary military planning and operations as well as civilian decisionmaking. This report provides an overview of the various imagery collection platforms, their strengths and limitations, the evolving organizational relationships that govern their use, as well as the steps Congress has taken to strengthen imagery capabilities. Imagery allows military commanders to undertake operations using precision-guided munitions with minimal civilian and friendly casualties; it also has a wide variety of civilian uses, providing overhead perspectives of environmental changes, natural disasters, or activities, such as mass burials, that foreign entities wish to hide. Imagery is collected by satellites, manned reconnaissance aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Satellite programs, initiated by the Intelligence Community in the midst of the Cold War; continue to be uniquely valuable but remain costly and commercial satellite imagery, now becoming available, may render some Government programs redundant. Manned reconnaissance aircraft continue to be widely used (as U-2s fly over Iraq), but the Defense Department and the services have often been reluctant to acquire replacement planes, preferring to invest scarce funds in bombers and fighters. UAVs are promising and potentially cost effective, but acquisition programs have been frustratingly slow and few operational systems are currently available despite a decade of efforts. Often critical of the executive branch's management of imagery, Congress has shaped the acquisition of collection platforms through a number of initiatives. It has encouraged the procurement of larger numbers of smaller satellites that can be used more flexibly than the Cold War systems. It has urged the services to retain or acquire manned reconnaissance aircraft, a message that the Defense Department appears to have received. The potential of UAVs has been appreciated for some time, but the slow pace of acquisition programs led Congress to mandate the establishment of a centralized effort in 1993. When, however, difficulties persisted, many Members called for the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office to be abolished, a step that the Pentagon intends to take by October 1998. Efforts to acquire and utilize imagery are complicated by two major factors in additional to inevitable budgetary considerations. The first is technological; imagery acquisition systems, especially UAVs, are not mature systems. They are subject to trial-and-error experimentation, cancellations, delays, and cost overruns. The second is organizational; imagery collection and analysis involves a number of agencies, inside and outside the Department of Defense, and coordination is complex and difficult. Furthermore, imagery is produced in response to the disparate and not inevitably compatible requirements of Washington decisionmakers and military commanders. Congressional oversight is undertaken by a number of different committees. Taken together these factors make imagery an especially important and difficult issue for policymakers in both Congress and the executive branch.