The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (25 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
July 18, 1997 |
| Report Number |
97-716 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Jeri Hawthorne and David F. Burrelli, Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
This document also available in PDF Image .
The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) was initiated by Congress in the early 1900s.
Throughout much of its existence as a government-sponsored and funded organization, little
controversy surrounded the program, and in fact, it was (and remains today) a popular program
among sportsmen, collectors, and various other groups. However, since the 1980s, with gun control
becoming a key political issue, the CMP has been surrounded with contention (so much so that
Congress made it a private, autonomous entity in October 1996). Some of the issues are:
The M1 rifle. One amenity offered by the CMP to its affiliates is the
opportunity to purchase
the semi-automatic, M1 Garand rifle. Considered to be a collector's item by many sportsmen and
gun collectors, the M1 rifle has not been used by the U.S. military since 1957. Gun control advocates
have argued that this program is a "million dollar gun giveaway" by the government, voicing concern
that the CMP is providing military weapons to the general public. Those in favor of the CMP's sale
of the weapons respond that in order to purchase an M1 through the CMP, one must go through a
much more rigorous process than those who purchase weapons in the market, in fact a rigorous form
of gun control. Other issues surrounding the sale of the M1 rifle exist as well.
Affiliation with the National Rifle Association. Some advocates of gun
control have argued
that the CMP is a front for the NRA. Although a supporter of the CMP, the NRA exists separate
from the CMP, and members of one program are not required to participate in the other. By the
nature of their existence, however, the two groups do interact with one another. The similarities the
two organizations share have caused alarm among gun control advocates.
Anti-government groups. Critics of the CMP claim that it is connected to
paramilitary,
anti-government organizations. Though the possibility for this does exist, it is highly unlikely, given
the rigorous background check one must go through when applying to purchase weapons or
participate. Under law, participants must submit an affidavit to participate in any programs either
sponsored or supported by the CMP.
Privatization of the CMP. With the privatization of the CMP in October
1996, Congress
removed the government from its sponsorship of a citizens' military training program. However,
because of the extensive ammunition and weapons that the Army still "holds" for the CMP, and
because of the fact that these weapons were given to the program at the time of its privatization, the
question of the government's role has now become an issue.
