Home
Solutions
Products
Pricing
Resources
Request Demo
Start Free
Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo
StateStorm

Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 1412 new people
  • 50 new organizations
  • 1514 new photos
  • 1965 job history records for people in our database
  • 586 education records for people in our database
  • 3031 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 5 new people through the revolving door
  • 257 new policy reports
  • 176 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 11857 new press releases
  • 19 new town halls
  • 6 new hearings

Caught Our Eye Rss

» More from Caught Our Eye
» More from our DevBlog

Internet Indecency: The Supreme Court Decision on the Communications Decency Act (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (4 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date July 1, 1997
Report Number 97-660
Report Type Report
Authors Henry Cohen, American Law Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

In Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union , No. 96-511 (June 26, 1997), the Supreme Court, by a 7-2 vote, declared unconstitutional two provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) that prohibited indecent communications to minors on the Internet. The CDA is Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, P.L. 104-104 . Section 502 of the Act rewrote 47 U.S.C. Section 223(a) and added subsections (d) through (h) to 47 U.S.C. Section 223. It did not amend subsections (b) or (c), which restrict commercial dial-a-porn services. In Reno v. ACLU , the Supreme Court struck down Section 223(a) in part and Section 223(d) in whole.
HomeAbout Us Contact UsPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseJoin Us
© LegiStorm
LegiStorm
2101 L St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20037
(202) 360-4172 / congress@legistorm.com