Capital Markets: Public and Private Securities Offerings (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (40 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Oct. 2, 2024 |
Report Number |
R45221 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Eva Su |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised July 26, 2018 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 6, 2018 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium June 8, 2018 (46 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
U.S. capital markets are the largest and considered to be the most efficient in the world.
Companies rely heavily on capital access to fund growth and create jobs. As the principal
regulator of U.S. capital markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires that
offers and sales of securities either be registered with the SEC or be undertaken with an
exemption from registration. Registered securities offerings, often calledpublic offerings, are
available to all types of investors and have more rigorous disclosure requirements. By contrast,
securities offerings that are exempt from SEC registration are referred to as private offerings and
are mainly available to more sophisticated investors.
Some policymakers have concluded that changes in market trends require updated regulations
governing capital access. Specifically, the number of publicly listed U.S. companies has declined
by half over the last two decades, and small- to medium-sized companies are said to have more
difficulty accessing capital relative to larger companies. Additionally, new capital access tools not
previously part of the SEC regulatory regime, such as crowdfunding and initial coin offerings,
have emerged. These new tools are especially helpful for small businesses and startups.
The bipartisan Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act; P.L. 112-106) scaled
regulation for smaller companies and reduced regulations in general for certain types of capital
formation. It established a number of new options to expand capital access through both public
and private offerings, including a new provision for crowdfunding. Parts of the Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation Act (JOBS Act 2.0; P.L. 114-94) provided additional relief. Following the
JOBS Act, the public and private offering dichotomy has started to blur, and securities regulation
has become increasingly tailored to suit companies of different sizes and with different needs.
However, concerns over capital formation have persisted, given that the number of IPOs
remained at far below long-term average levels post-JOBS Act and smaller businesses continue to
face capital access pressure. To address these concerns, Congress has considered numerous
legislative proposals to further expand the scaled approach, with some proposals building on
existing JOBS Act provisions. The most notable of these proposals is S. 488, a capital formation
package referred to as JOBS Act 3.0. Originally a relatively narrow bill, S. 488 was passed by the
Senate and then was amended significantly and passed by the House in a 406-4 vote on July 17,
2018. The package includes 32 titles, many of which have previously passed the House with
bipartisan support as standalone bills.
The policy debate surrounding capital formation proposals often focuses on expanding capital
access and protecting investors, two of the SEC’s core missions. Expanding capital access
promotes capital formation and allows for greater access of investment opportunities for more
investors. Investor protection is considered to be important for healthy and efficient capital
markets because many investors would be more willing to provide capital, and even at a lower
cost, if they could expect enforceable contracts for their investments through a transparent
process. At times, expanding capital access can come at the expense of investor protection. For
example, proposals that reduce the registration and disclosures that a company must make can
decrease the company’s compliance costs and increase the speed and efficiency of capital
formation. But the reduced disclosures may expose a company’s investors to additional risks if
they are not receiving information that is important to making informed investment decisions.
This report analyzes legislative proposals that would generally affect the terms and amounts of
capital provided to companies by investors. It analyzes a number of current legislative proposals
and agency actions to expand both public and private securities offerings through amendments to
program design, investor access, and disclosure requirements, among other provisions.