Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Earned Wage Access Products (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (3 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date July 31, 2024
Report Number IF12727
Report Type In Focus
Authors Paul Tierno; Karl E. Schneider
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

For many people, the need for cash in between paychecks is a substantial burden. Earned wage access (EWA) products have generally been developed by technology-focused, nonbank financial technology companies (or “fintechs”) to provide wages to workers upon demand. EWA products may help individuals manage their personal cash flows arguably at a lower cost and with greater flexibility relative to traditional financial products, but they may also introduce debt sustainability risks. Whether an EWA product should be considered credit or a spot payment for wages an employee already earned, and what consumer protections should apply, are debated policy issues. EWA is currently regulated by a growing patchwork of state laws, with dramatic differences across the country. Meanwhile, firms offering EWA products may structure them differently for various reasons, including to avoid being regulated as consumer credit. Both consumer advocates and EWA providers have called for a consistent federal framework, albeit with different levels of desired regulatory scrutiny. In July 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a proposed interpretative rule arguing that EWA products constitute credit and require Truth in Lending Act (TILA; P.L. 90-321, 15 U.S.C. §§1601 et seq.) disclosures. Legislation related to EWA that would supersede the CFPB’s rulemaking has seen action in the 118th Congress. H.R. 7428 would exempt EWA from being classified as credit subject to TILA disclosures, mandate other disclosure requirements, and require EWA firms to provide fee-free versions of their services. Supporters, including EWA providers, argue that this law would provide needed clarity to the market. Critics, including consumer groups, contend that exempting EWA from TILA hides the true cost of credit.