Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Political-to-Career Conversions ("Burrowing In") (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (3 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date July 30, 2024
Report Number IF12720
Report Type In Focus
Authors Barbara L. Schwemle
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

Some individuals who are serving in appointed (noncareer) positions in the executive branch convert to career positions in the competitive service, the Senior Executive Service (SES), or the excepted service. This practice, commonly referred to as “burrowing in,” is permissible when laws and regulations governing career appointments are followed. While such conversions may occur at any time, they frequently do so during the transition period between Administrations. Generally, these appointees were selected noncompetitively and are serving in such positions as Schedule C, noncareer SES, or limited tenure SES that involve policy determinations or require a close and confidential relationship with the department or agency head and other top officials. Career employees, on the other hand, are to be selected on the basis of merit and without political influence following a fair and open process evaluating their knowledge, skills, and experience compared against that of other applicants. The tenure of noncareer and career employees also differs. The former is generally limited to the terms of the Administrations in which they are appointed or serve at the pleasure of the persons who appointed them. The latter constitute a workforce that continues the operations of government without regard to the change of Administrations. Beyond the fundamental concern that the conversion of an individual from an appointed (noncareer) position to a career position may not have followed applicable legal and regulatory requirements, “burrowing in” can raise other concerns. Observers might raise concerns about potential outcomes of the decision (whether valid or not), such as that an appointee converting to a career position may limit the promotion opportunities for other employees—who were competitively selected for their career positions following examination of their knowledge, skills, and experience—or that the individual who is converted to a career position may seek to undermine the work of the new Administration whose policies may be different from those that he or she espoused when serving as an appointee. Both perceptions may increase the tension between political and career staff and hinder the effective operation of government, which relies on career staff to provide the continuity and expertise that underpins it. Public administration literature emphasizes the importance of effective working relationships between noncareer and career staff.