The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (35 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised May 29, 2024 |
Report Number |
R44981 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
M. Angeles Villarreal; Ian F. Fergusson |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Sept. 29, 2023 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 28, 2021 (49 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 27, 2020 (48 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 2, 2020 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 26, 2019 (55 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 26, 2018 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 6, 2018 (47 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 27, 2018 (48 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 7, 2018 (48 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 12, 2017 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Oct. 2, 2017 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The 115th Congress faces policy issues related to the Trump Administration’s renegotiation and
modernization of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). NAFTA negotiations
were first launched in 1992 under President H. W. Bush and continued under President Bill
Clinton. President Clinton signed the agreement into law on December 8 1993 (P.L. 103-182),
and NAFTA entered into force on January 1, 1994. It is particularly significant because it was the
most comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) negotiated at the time, contained several
groundbreaking provisions, and was the first of a new generation of U.S. FTAs later negotiated.
Congress played a major role during its consideration and, after contentious and comprehensive
debate, ultimately approved legislation to implement the agreement.
NAFTA established trade liberalization commitments that set new rules and disciplines for future
FTAs on issues important to the United States, including intellectual property rights protection,
services trade, dispute settlement procedures, investment, labor, and environment. NAFTA’s
market-opening provisions gradually eliminated nearly all tariff and most nontariff barriers on
merchandise trade. At the time of NAFTA, average applied U.S. duties on imports from Mexico
were 2.07%, while U.S. businesses faced average tariffs of 10%, in addition to nontariff and
investment barriers, in Mexico. The U.S.-Canada FTA had been in effect since 1989.
The Trump Administration has made NAFTA renegotiation and modernization a prominent
priority of its trade policy. President Trump has characterized the agreement as the “worst trade
deal,” and has stated that he may seek to withdraw from the agreement. He has focused on the
trade deficit with Mexico as a major reason for his critique. On May 18, 2017, the Trump
Administration sent a 90-day notification to Congress of its intent to begin talks to renegotiate
NAFTA, as required by the 2015 Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) (P.L. 114-26). Negotiators
began the talks on August 16, 2017. They have held eight formal rounds and are continuing talks
on technical issues. Contentious issues in the negotiations include auto rules of origin, dispute
settlement provisions, agriculture, government procurement, and other issues. Mexico’s
President-elect, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who enters into office on December 1, 2018, has
stated that he supports NAFTA and would support a previously negotiated agreement. All three
North American leaders have expressed interest in reaching a deal over the next several months.
Congress will likely continue to be a major participant in shaping and potentially considering an
updated NAFTA. Key issues for Congress in regard to NAFTA renegotiation or modernization
include the constitutional authority of Congress over international trade, its role in revising or
withdrawing from the agreement, U.S. negotiating objectives, the impact on U.S. industries and
the U.S. economy, the negotiating objectives of Canada and Mexico, and the impact on broader
relations with Canada and Mexico. The outcome of these negotiations will have implications for
the future direction of U.S. trade policy under President Trump.
NAFTA renegotiation presents opportunities to modernize the agreement. For example, the
widespread use of the internet has significantly affected economic activities. A renegotiation
could incorporate elements of more recent U.S. FTAs, such as digital and services trade and
enhanced IPR protection. Many U.S. manufacturers, services providers, and agricultural
producers oppose efforts to eliminate NAFTA and ask that the Trump Administration “do no
harm” in the NAFTA renegotiation because they have much to lose. Other groups contend that
NAFTA renegotiation should include stronger and more enforceable labor protections, provisions
on currency manipulation, and stricter rules of origin.