Financing the U.S. Trade Deficit (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (23 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Feb. 10, 2017 |
Report Number |
RL33274 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
James K. Jackson, Specialist in International Trade and Finance |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Oct. 7, 2016 (23 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 17, 2015 (20 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 11, 2015 (18 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 24, 2014 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 23, 2013 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 20, 2013 (18 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 10, 2013 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Nov. 16, 2012 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 7, 2011 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 22, 2010 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 5, 2010 (18 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 22, 2008 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 22, 2008 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 31, 2008 (15 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Sept. 4, 2007 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 18, 2007 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Feb. 14, 2006 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The U.S. merchandise trade deficit is a part of the overall U.S. balance of payments, a summary
statement of all economic transactions between the residents of the United States and the rest of
the world, during a given period of time. Some Members of Congress and other observers have
grown concerned over the magnitude of the U.S. merchandise trade deficit and the associated
increase in U.S. dollar-denominated assets owned by foreigners. International trade recovered
from the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the subsequent slowdown in global economic
activity that reduced global trade flows and, consequently, reduced the size of the U.S. trade
deficit. Now, however, U.S. exporters face new challenges with an increase in the international
exchange value of the dollar relative to other key currencies and the slow rate of economic
growth in important export markets in Europe and Asia. This report provides an overview of the
U.S. balance of payments, an explanation of the broader role of capital flows in the U.S.
economy, an explanation of how the country finances its trade deficit or a trade surplus, and the
implications for Congress and the country of the large inflows of capital from abroad. The major
observations indicate that
The current account balance, the broadest measure of U.S. trade in goods,
services, and certain income flows, worsened by 18% in 2015 from that recorded
in 2014. Foreign-owned assets in the United States continued to outpace U.S.
ownership of foreign assets, reflecting the deficit in the current account, but the
net amount, or the difference between U.S.-acquisition of foreign assets and
foreign acquisition of U.S. assets, dropped by about one-third in 2015 compared
with 2014 and down by over half since 2012. The relative decline in foreign
acquisitions of U.S. assets in 2015 reflected a drop in the net private purchases of
U.S. corporate stocks and a decline by one-third in net private purchases of U.S.
treasury securities. In addition, foreign official purchases of U.S. portfolio
purchases shifted from positive net purchases in 2014 to negative net purchases
in 2015, including a 38% decline in purchases of corporate stocks and a 58%
decline in official purchases of U.S. Treasury securities. Foreign private net
purchases of U.S. Treasury securities in 2015 fell by one-third from those in
2014, but foreign private purchases of U.S. equities increased by 20% in 2015
compared with 2014. At the same time, foreign direct investment increased by
83% in 2015 compared with 2014, rising from $207 billion in 2014 to $379
billion in 2015; U.S. direct investment abroad in 2015 rose slightly above the
amount invested in 2014, although U.S. net purchases of foreign equities and
debt securities in 2015 fell by 75%, compared with net purchases in 2014. The
inflow of capital from abroad supplements domestic sources of capital and likely
allows the United States to maintain its current level of economic activity at
interest rates that are below the level they likely would be without the capital
inflows.
Foreign official and private acquisitions of dollar-denominated assets likely will
generate a stream of returns to overseas investors that would have stayed in the
U.S. economy and supplemented other domestic sources of capital had the assets
not been acquired by foreign investors. In general terms, foreign private holders
of U.S. Treasury securities are taxed on their interest income, depending on U.S.
tax conventions with other countries.