The Endangered Species Act: A Primer (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (30 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Revised Sept. 8, 2016 |
| Report Number |
RL31654 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
M. Lynne Corn and Eugene H. Buck, Specialists in Natural Resources Policy; Kristina Alexander, Legislative Attorney |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Oct. 9, 2012 (30 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 26, 2010 (26 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 16, 2008 (29 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 2, 2007 (30 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 8, 2007 (29 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Sept. 27, 2006 (29 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium March 31, 2005 (28 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The Endangered Species Act (ESA, P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544) has a stated purpose of conserving species identified as endangered or threatened with extinction, and conserving ecosystems on which they depend. It is perennially controversial because the protections provided can make it the visible policy focal point for underlying situations involving the allocation of scarce or diminishing lands or resources, especially in instances where societal values may be changing. In response to past controversies, Congress has repeatedly considered minor amendments and major changes to the act. No action has been taken to date in the 112th Congress, but the issue is likely to resurface in the 113th Congress.
The purpose of the report is to describe the major features and controversies of the ESA as background for consideration of possible amendments in the 113th Congress. The major features of ESA and related controversies are briefly summarized as follows:
ESA retains its authorities even though its authorization for funding expired in 1992, and funds may be and have been appropriated in the absence of a current authorization. ESA prohibitions and penalties remain in effect regardless of appropriations.
ESA's principal parts are the listing and protection of species, designation of critical habitat and avoidance of its destruction, and consultation by federal agencies regarding actions that may harm listed species. Each of these three principal parts is discussed in detail.
Dwindling species are listed as either endangered or threatened according to assessments of the risk of their extinction. Once a species is listed, legal tools are available to aid its recovery and to protect its habitat.
ESA has broad provisions for citizen suits to enforce the act, and lawsuits have played a major role in enforcement and interpretation of many, or perhaps most, of the act's provisions.
ESA provides for exemptions from the act for agency projects, but the provisions are little used for a variety of reasons.
The act is administered primarily by the Fish and Wildlife Service, and by the National Marine Fisheries Service for certain marine and anadromous species.
ESA is the implementing legislation for U.S. participation in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
ESA often becomes controversial even where a particular species is not the focus of a controversy but a symptom of it.
