The U.S. Tsunami Program: A Brief Overview (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (15 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Nov. 20, 2015 |
Report Number |
R41686 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Peter Folger, Specialist in Energy and Natural Resources Policy |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised March 18, 2015 (16 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 20, 2015 (15 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 18, 2011 (11 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 15, 2011 (9 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised March 14, 2011 (5 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium March 11, 2011 (5 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Weather Service
(NWS) manages two tsunami warning centers that monitor, detect, and issue warnings for
tsunamis. The NWS operates the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) at Ford Island,
Hawaii, and the National Tsunami Warning Center (NTWC) at Palmer, Alaska.
The tsunami warning centers monitor and evaluate data from seismic networks and determine if a
tsunami is likely based on the location, magnitude, and depth of an earthquake. The centers
monitor relevant water-level data, typically with tide-level gauges, and data from NOAA’s
network of Deep-Ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) detection buoys to
confirm that a tsunami has been generated or to cancel any warnings if no tsunami is detected. As
of November 18, 2015, 4 of the United States’ 39 DART buoys (10%) were not operational. This
figure represents an improvement over the course of the year; in March 2015, 9 of the buoys were
not operational (23%). The inoperable stations likely would not prevent the issuance of tsunami
warnings, which are primarily a function of seismic data from an earthquake or landslide,
combined with location information about the event.
On January 7, 2015, the House passed by unanimous consent H.R. 34, the Tsunami Warning,
Education, and Research Act of 2015. The bill would amend the Tsunami Warning and Education
Act (P.L. 109-424) and authorize appropriations for the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation
Program (NTHMP) through FY2017. Authorization for NTHMP appropriations expired in
FY2012. On February 23, 2015, the Senate introduced its version of the bill, S. 533, which would
authorize appropriations for six years through FY2021. On October 6, 2015, the Senate passed its
legislation as an amendment in the nature of a substitute for H.R. 34 by unanimous consent.
Neither bill would make fundamental changes to the NTHMP, but both would broaden the
program to include an increased focus on tsunami research and outreach, among other alterations.
The NTHMP assists states in emergency planning and in developing maps of potential coastal
inundation for a tsunami of a given intensity. A goal of the program is to ensure adequate advance
warning of tsunamis along all U.S. coastal areas and appropriate community response to a
tsunami event. The NTHMP formed in 1995 in response to the recognition of a tsunami threat to
Oregon, Washington, and Northern California from a large earthquake on the Cascadia
subduction zone, which lies off the northwest coast of the United States and is capable of
generating earthquakes as large as magnitude 9 or greater. The NTHMP also operates tsunami
disaster outreach and education programs that support NOAA’s TsunamiReady program.
During FY2015, NOAA reorganized portions of its budget and aligned costs for tsunami activities
into two accounts. For FY2015, $12.2 million was allocated under Observations Programs,
Projects, and Activities (PPA), and $19.2 million was allocated under Analyze, Forecast, and
Support PPA, for a total of $31.4 million. The FY2016 budget request is $6 million less than the
FY2015 enacted amount.
Key issues for Congress include maintenance and availability of the DART buoy network. P.L.
109-424 states that “maintaining operational tsunami detection equipment is the highest priority
within the program carried out under this Act.” The House-passed bill would require that “the
Administration’s operational tsunami detection equipment is properly maintained,” but the
Senate-passed version would be more specific and require, “to the degree practicable, [the
maintenance of] not less than 80 percent of the [DART] buoy array at operational capacity.”