Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (35 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised March 2, 2016
Report Number RS22030
Report Type Report
Authors Kristin Archick, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 1, 2014 (33 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 4, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 21, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 22, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 3, 2012 (24 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 21, 2012 (22 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 18, 2011 (21 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 2, 2011 (19 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 9, 2010 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 13, 2010 (16 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Jan. 28, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 10, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 16, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 12, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 13, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Jan. 19, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the subsequent revelation of Al Qaeda cells in Europe gave new momentum to European Union (EU) initiatives to combat terrorism and improve police, judicial, and intelligence cooperation among its member states. Other deadly incidents in Europe, such as the Madrid and London bombings in 2004 and 2005, respectively, injected further urgency into strengthening EU counterterrorism capabilities. Among other steps, the EU has established a common definition of terrorism and a common list of terrorist groups, an EU arrest warrant, enhanced tools to stem terrorist financing, and new measures to strengthen external EU border controls and improve transport security. Over the years, the EU has also encouraged member states to devote resources to countering radicalization and terrorist recruitment; such efforts have received renewed attention in light of concerns about the threats posed by European fighters returning from the conflicts in Syria and Iraq, highlighted most recently by the November 13, 2015, attacks in Paris, France. Promoting law enforcement and intelligence cooperation with the United States has been another top EU priority since 2001. Washington has largely welcomed enhanced counterterrorism cooperation with the EU. Since 9/11, contacts between U.S. and EU officials on police, judicial, and border control policy matters have increased substantially. A number of U.S.-EU agreements have been reached; these include information-sharing arrangements between the United States and EU police and judicial bodies, U.S.-EU treaties on extradition and mutual legal assistance, and accords on container security and airline passenger data. In addition, the United States and the EU have been working together to curb terrorist financing, strengthen transport security, and address the foreign fighter phenomenon. Nevertheless, some challenges persist in fostering closer U.S.-EU cooperation in these fields. Among the most prominent and long-standing are data privacy and data protection issues. The negotiation of several U.S.-EU information-sharing agreements, from those related to tracking terrorist financial data to sharing airline passenger information, has been complicated by EU concerns about whether the United States could guarantee a sufficient level of protection for European citizens’ personal data. EU worries about U.S. data protection safeguards and practices were further heightened by the unauthorized disclosures of U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs in mid-2013 and subsequent allegations of U.S. collection activities in Europe. Other issues that have led to periodic tensions include detainee policies, differences in the U.S. and EU terrorist designation lists, and balancing measures to improve border controls and border security with the need to facilitate legitimate transatlantic travel and commerce. Congressional decisions related to data privacy, intelligence-gathering, border controls, visa policy, and transport security may affect how future U.S.-EU counterterrorism cooperation evolves. EU officials have welcomed passage of the Judicial Redress Act (P.L. 114-126) to provide EU citizens with a limited right of judicial redress for privacy violations in a law enforcement context, but they have expressed unease with some provisions in the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (passed as part of P.L. 114- 113 in the wake of the Paris attacks and heightened U.S. concerns about European citizens fighting with terrorist groups abroad). Given the European Parliament’s growing influence in many of these policy areas, Members of Congress may be able to help shape the Parliament’s views and responses through ongoing contacts and the existing Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue (TLD). This report examines the evolution of U.S.-EU counterterrorism cooperation, current issues, and the ongoing challenges that may be of interest in the 114th Congress. Also see CRS Report R44003, European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues for the United States, coordinated by Kristin Archick.