U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (35 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised March 2, 2016 |
Report Number |
RS22030 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Kristin Archick, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Dec. 1, 2014 (33 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Sept. 4, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 21, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 22, 2013 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 3, 2012 (24 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 21, 2012 (22 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 18, 2011 (21 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 2, 2011 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 9, 2010 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 13, 2010 (16 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 28, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 10, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 16, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 12, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 13, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 19, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the subsequent revelation of
Al Qaeda cells in Europe gave new momentum to European Union (EU) initiatives to combat
terrorism and improve police, judicial, and intelligence cooperation among its member states.
Other deadly incidents in Europe, such as the Madrid and London bombings in 2004 and 2005,
respectively, injected further urgency into strengthening EU counterterrorism capabilities. Among
other steps, the EU has established a common definition of terrorism and a common list of
terrorist groups, an EU arrest warrant, enhanced tools to stem terrorist financing, and new
measures to strengthen external EU border controls and improve transport security. Over the
years, the EU has also encouraged member states to devote resources to countering radicalization
and terrorist recruitment; such efforts have received renewed attention in light of concerns about
the threats posed by European fighters returning from the conflicts in Syria and Iraq, highlighted
most recently by the November 13, 2015, attacks in Paris, France.
Promoting law enforcement and intelligence cooperation with the United States has been another
top EU priority since 2001. Washington has largely welcomed enhanced counterterrorism
cooperation with the EU. Since 9/11, contacts between U.S. and EU officials on police, judicial,
and border control policy matters have increased substantially. A number of U.S.-EU agreements
have been reached; these include information-sharing arrangements between the United States
and EU police and judicial bodies, U.S.-EU treaties on extradition and mutual legal assistance,
and accords on container security and airline passenger data. In addition, the United States and
the EU have been working together to curb terrorist financing, strengthen transport security, and
address the foreign fighter phenomenon.
Nevertheless, some challenges persist in fostering closer U.S.-EU cooperation in these fields.
Among the most prominent and long-standing are data privacy and data protection issues. The
negotiation of several U.S.-EU information-sharing agreements, from those related to tracking
terrorist financial data to sharing airline passenger information, has been complicated by EU
concerns about whether the United States could guarantee a sufficient level of protection for
European citizens’ personal data. EU worries about U.S. data protection safeguards and practices
were further heightened by the unauthorized disclosures of U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)
surveillance programs in mid-2013 and subsequent allegations of U.S. collection activities in
Europe. Other issues that have led to periodic tensions include detainee policies, differences in
the U.S. and EU terrorist designation lists, and balancing measures to improve border controls
and border security with the need to facilitate legitimate transatlantic travel and commerce.
Congressional decisions related to data privacy, intelligence-gathering, border controls, visa
policy, and transport security may affect how future U.S.-EU counterterrorism cooperation
evolves. EU officials have welcomed passage of the Judicial Redress Act (P.L. 114-126) to
provide EU citizens with a limited right of judicial redress for privacy violations in a law
enforcement context, but they have expressed unease with some provisions in the Visa Waiver
Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015 (passed as part of P.L. 114-
113 in the wake of the Paris attacks and heightened U.S. concerns about European citizens
fighting with terrorist groups abroad). Given the European Parliament’s growing influence in
many of these policy areas, Members of Congress may be able to help shape the Parliament’s
views and responses through ongoing contacts and the existing Transatlantic Legislators’
Dialogue (TLD). This report examines the evolution of U.S.-EU counterterrorism cooperation,
current issues, and the ongoing challenges that may be of interest in the 114th Congress. Also see
CRS Report R44003, European Fighters in Syria and Iraq: Assessments, Responses, and Issues
for the United States, coordinated by Kristin Archick.