Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Rural Water Supply and Sewer Systems: Background Information (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (10 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised Feb. 29, 2016
Report Number 98-64
Authors Claudia Copeland, Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 22, 2014 (11 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 5, 2014 (10 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 17, 2010 (9 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 30, 2009 (9 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 20, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 25, 2008 (5 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   April 12, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

The Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act impose requirements regarding drinking water quality and wastewater treatment in rural as well as urban areas of the United States. Approximately 19% of the U.S. population lives in areas defined by the Census Bureau as rural. Many rural communities need to complete water and waste disposal projects to improve the public health and environmental conditions of their citizens. Small water infrastructure systems often have higher rates of noncompliance than larger systems. In addition, because small systems generally lack economies of scale, their customers face a particularly heavy financial burden to meet needs for clean water investments. Funding needs are high (more than $130 billion, according to state surveys). Several federal programs assist rural communities in meeting these requirements. In dollar terms, the largest are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, but they do not focus solely on rural areas. The Department of Agriculture’s grant and loan programs support significant financial activity and are directed solely at rural areas. Meeting infrastructure funding needs of rural areas efficiently and effectively is likely to remain an issue of considerable Congressional interest.