Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

State Regulation of the Initiative Process: Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., et al. (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (6 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Jan. 21, 1999
Report Number RS20024
Report Type Report
Authors T.J. Halstead, American Law Division
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Summary:

While the authority to regulate political expression is sharply circumscribed by the Constitution, states traditionally have been granted significant leeway in regulating the electoral process for the sake of efficiency and veracity. Due to an increase in state attempts to regulate petition initiatives, these two divergent bodies of law have given rise to a great deal of confusion as to the point at which state regulation of the electoral process becomes violative of the First Amendment freedoms. The Supreme Court addressed this conflict recently in Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc., et al., clarifying the debate by analyzing various provisions of Colorado laws regulating initiative petitions.