Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Statutes: A List of Citations with Captions, Introductory Comments, and Bibliography (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (55 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Aug. 14, 1999 |
| Report Number |
RL30281 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Charles Doyle, American Law Division |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
Federal mandatory minimum sentencing statutes (mandatory minimums) demand that execution
or
incarceration follow criminal conviction. They cover drug dealing, murdering federal officials, and
using a gun to commit a federal crime. They circumscribe judicial sentencing discretion, although
they impose no limitations upon prosecutorial discretion or upon the President's power to pardon.
They have been criticized as unthinkingly harsh and incompatible with a rational sentencing
guideline system; yet they have also been embraced as hallmarks of truth in sentencing and a certain
means of incapacitating the criminally dangerous.
There are several varieties of mandatory minimums: the "not less than" statute, the flat sentence
statute, the piggy-back statute, and the guideline constructed mandatory minimum. The Eighth
Amendment cruel and unusual punishment clause condemns statutes that impose a mandatory
minimum penalty of death or a penalty that is grossly disproportionate to the offense. Few federal
mandatory minimums are imperiled under this standard and fewer still are susceptible to
constitutional attack on the grounds of separation of powers, equal protection, ex post facto, or
double jeopardy.
