The Impeachment Process in the Senate (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (28 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Feb. 15, 2024 |
Report Number |
R46185 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Elizabeth Rybicki; Michael Greene |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Jan. 27, 2021 (28 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 21, 2020 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 17, 2020 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
After the House impeaches a federal officer, the Senate conducts a trial to determine if the
individual should be removed from office. The Senate has a set of rules specific to the conduct of
an impeachment trial, most of which originated in the early 19th century.
The impeachment rules lay out specific steps that the Senate takes to organize for a trial. House
managers (Members of the House who present the case against the impeached officer in the
Senate) read the articles of impeachment on the Senate floor. The presiding officer and Senators
take an oath to do impartial justice, and the Senate issues a “summons” to the accused and
requests that a written answer be filed. The House managers are also invited to respond to the
answer of the impeached officer.
Actions after these organizing steps, however, are not specified in the impeachment rules. The
impeachment rules mention some actions that are common in judicial trials, such as opening and closing statements by the
parties to the case and the examination of witnesses, but provide little specific guidance. Instead, the rules allow the Senate,
when sitting for a trial, to set particular procedures through the approval of “orders.” Some orders of the Senate are
unanimous consent agreements, but others are proposals adopted by the Senate. If such a proposal is considered while the
Senate is sitting for the trial, then debate by the parties to the case (the House managers and the counsel for the accused) is
limited to one hour for each side. As a result, the support of three-fifths of the Senate to invoke cloture is not necessary to
reach a vote to approve a procedural proposal. Such proposals are subject to amendment, which are also debated by the
parties for one hour each side.
Compared to when the Senate meets in legislative and executive session, the opportunity for individual participation by
Senators in a Senate trial is limited. The rules require that any debate among Senators take place in closed session. Senators
can make motions under the impeachment rules, but these rules are silent on what motions can be offered, and when. In
modern trials, when Senators proposed motions, it was often pursuant to a previously-agreed-to order of the Senate. Senators
can also submit written questions during the trial—to House managers, counsel for the impeached officer, or witnesses—that
the presiding officer presents on their behalf. Orders of the Senate, however, might structure the time and process for posing
questions. During the open portion of an impeachment trial, Senators spend most of the time listening to arguments presented
by House managers and counsel for the impeached officer.
Impeachment Rule XI allows the Senate to create trial committees to hear and consider evidence and report it to the Senate.
Such committees were not intended to be used for presidential impeachments, but four of the seven impeachment trials
completed since 1936 concerned federal judges, and in each of these cases the Senate established a trial committee.
When the Senate meets in closed session to deliberate, each Senator may speak only once on each question. Such remarks are
limited to 15 minutes on the final question—whether the impeached officer is guilty or not guilty—and to 10 minutes on
other questions. On the final question, Senators respond “guilty” or “not guilty” on each article of impeachment. The support
of two-thirds of Senators present on an article is necessary to convict.
The presiding officer of a trial operates much like the presiding officer in regular Senate session, in that the chair may issue
an initial ruling, but any Senator could request that the full Senate vote instead. Because of the debate limitations in the
impeachment rules, procedural decisions appealed or submitted by the chair can be reached with majority support. In a
presidential impeachment trial, the Chief Justice of the United States is the presiding officer.
Although the impeachment rules prescribe that the Senate convene at noon for a trial, six days a week, a Senate majority can
alter this schedule. It is possible for the Senate to conduct legislative and executive business on the same calendar days that it
meets for a trial, but it must meet in legislative or executive session to do so. When the Senate is sitting as a Court of
Impeachment, legislative and executive business cannot occur.
The information presented in this report is drawn from published sources of congressional rules and precedents, as well as the
public record of past impeachment trial proceedings. It provides an overview of the procedures, and some past actions, but
should not be treated or cited as an authority on congressional proceedings. Authoritative guidance on the interpretation and
possible application of rules and precedents can be obtained only through consultation with the Office of the Senate
Parliamentarian