Arsenic in Drinking Water: Regulatory Developments and Issues (CRS Report for Congress)
| Release Date |
Revised April 13, 2010 |
| Report Number |
RS20672 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Mary Tiemann, Specialist in Environmental Policy |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Nov. 25, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 1, 2008 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 1, 2008 (5 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 3, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised May 1, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 17, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 5, 2006 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 20, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 7, 2005 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 29, 2002 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Nov. 16, 2001 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (P.L. 104-182) directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to update the standard for arsenic in drinking water. In 2001, EPA issued a new arsenic rule that set the legal limit for arsenic in tap water at 10 parts per billion (ppb), replacing a 50 ppb standard set in 1975, before arsenic was classified as a carcinogen. The arsenic rule was to enter into effect on March 23, 2001, and water systems were given until January 2006 to comply. EPA concluded that the rule would provide health benefits, but projected that compliance would be costly for some small systems. Many water utilities and communities expressed concern that EPA had underestimated the rule's costs significantly. Consequently, EPA postponed the rule's effective date to February 22, 2002, to review the science and cost and benefit analyses supporting the rule. After completing the review in October 2001, EPA affirmed the 10 ppb standard. The new standard became enforceable for water systems in January 2006.
Since the rule was completed, Congress and EPA have focused on how to help communities comply with the new standard. In the past several Congresses, numerous bills have been offered to provide more financial and technical assistance and/or compliance flexibility to small systems; however, none of the bills has been enacted. Similar legislation again has been offered in the 111th Congress, while broader infrastructure financing bills have received greater congressional attention.
