Vulnerable Youth: Federal Mentoring Programs and Issues (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (18 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised July 22, 2019 |
Report Number |
RL34306 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Adrienne L. Fernandes-Alcantara, Specialist in Social Policy |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Feb. 23, 2018 (21 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 3, 2018 (21 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 17, 2017 (34 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 22, 2015 (34 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 21, 2015 (38 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 28, 2014 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 20, 2012 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 5, 2010 (45 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 20, 2008 (45 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 24, 2008 (42 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 4, 2008 (41 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Youth mentoring refers to a relationship between youth
—
particularly those most at risk of
experiencing negative outcomes in adolescence and adulthood
—
and the adults who support and
guide them. The origin of the modern youth mentoring concept is credited to
the efforts of charity
groups that formed during the Progressive era of the early 1900s to provide practical assistance to
poor and juvenile justice
-
involved youth, including help with finding employment.
Approximately
4
.5 million youth today are involved in formal mentoring relationships through
organizations such as
Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) of America. Contemporary mentoring
programs seek to improve outcomes and reduce risks among vulnerable youth by providing
po
sitive role models who regularly meet with the youth in community or school settings. Some
programs have broad youth development goals
,
while others focus more narrowly on a particular
outcome. Evaluations of the BBBS program and studies of other mentoring
programs
demonstrate an association between mentoring and some positive outcomes,
but the impact of
mentoring
and the ability for mentored youth to sustain gains over time are less certain.
There is no single overarch
ing federal policy on mentoring
or an
entity that coordinates
mentoring supports across the federal government. The Federal Mentoring Council had served as
a resource on mentoring issues for the feder
al government from 2006 to 2008
and is no longer
active. Currently, t
he federal government pro
vides funding for mentoring pr
imarily through a
grant program
with annual appropriations for the program of about $78 million to $90 million in
recent years.
This grant is administered
by the Department of Justice’s (DOJ)
Office of Juvenile
Justice and Del
inquency Prevention (OJJDP) within the Office of Justice
Programs. Program
funding has
been
used for research and direct mentoring services to select populations of youth,
such as those involved or at risk
of being involved in the juvenile justice system.
Other federal
agencies provide or are authorized to support mentoring as one aspect of a larger program. For
example
, select programs carried out by the Corporation for
National and Community Service
(CNCS) can provide mentoring, among other services. Yout
h Challe
NG
e, an educational and
leadership program for at
-
risk youth administered by the Department
of Defense
’s
(DOD
’s
)
National Guard
, includes mentoring as an aspect of its program. Federal agencies also coordinate
on federal mentoring issues.
Two othe
r federal programs
—
the Mento
ring Children of Prisoners
(MCP) program and Safe and
Drug
-
Free Schools (SDFS) Mentoring program
—
provided a significant source of federal funding
for mentoring services. However, the programs were short
-
lived: funding for the MC
P program
was discontinued beginning with FY2011
,
and funding for the SDFS program was discontinued
beginning with FY2010. The
MCP
program was created in response to the growing number of
children under age 18 with at least one parent incarcerated in a fed
eral or state correctional
facility. The program was intended, in part, to reduce the chance that mentored youth would use
drugs and skip school. Similarly, the SDFS Mentoring program provided school
-
based mentoring
to reduce school dropout and improve rel
ationships for youth at risk of educational failure and
with other risk factors. As part of its FY2010 budget justifications, the Obama Administration had
proposed eliminating the program because of an evaluation showing that it did not have an impact
on s
tudents overall in terms of interpersonal relationships, academic outcomes, and delinquent
behaviors.
Issues relevant to the federal role in mentoring include the limitations of research
on outcomes for
mentored youth
, the quality of mentoring programs,
an
d
the potential need for additional men
tors