The U.S.-Japan Alliance (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (57 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised June 13, 2019 |
Report Number |
RL33740 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Emma Chanlett-Avery, Specialist in Asian Affairs; Weston S. Konishi, Analyst in Asian Affairs |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised July 27, 2016 (36 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Feb. 9, 2016 (34 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 12, 2013 (33 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 18, 2011 (20 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised July 23, 2009 (27 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 10, 2008 (26 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The U.S.-Japan alliance has long been an anchor of the U.S. security role in Asia. Forged in the
U.S. occupation of Japan after its defeat in World War II, the alliance provides a platform for U.S.
military readiness in the Pacific. About 50,000 U.S. troops are stationed in Japan and have the
exclusive use of 85 facilities. In exchange for the use of these bases, the United States guarantees
Japan’s security. Security challenges in the region, particularly nuclear and missile tests by North
Korea and increased Chinese maritime activities, have reinforced U.S.-Japan cooperation in
recent years. The vitality of the alliance is particularly salient as the Obama Administration
renewed the U.S. focus on the Asia-Pacific region through a strategic “rebalancing.” The U.S.-
Japan alliance, missing a strategic anchor since the end of the Cold War, may have found a new
guiding rationale in shaping the environment for China’s rise.
Since the early 2000s, the United States and Japan have taken significant strides in improving the
operational capability of the alliance as a combined force, despite constraints. In addition to
serving as hub for forward-deployed U.S. forces, Japan fields its own advanced military assets,
many of which complement U.S. forces in missions like anti-submarine operations. The joint
response to a 2011 tsunami and earthquake in Japan demonstrated the interoperability of the two
militaries. Cooperation on ballistic missile defense and new attention to the cyber and space
domains has also been strong. Japan’s own defense policy has evolved, and major strategic
documents reflect a new attention to operational readiness and flexibility.
Steady progress on an initiative to realign U.S. forces based in Japan has been overshadowed by
the failure to resolve difficult basing issues on Okinawa, the major U.S. forward logistics base in
East Asia. About 40% of all facilities used by U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ) and half of USFJ military
personnel are located in the prefecture, which comprises less than 1% of Japan’s total land area.
The sustainability of the U.S. military presence on Okinawa remains a critical challenge for the
alliance. The long-delayed plan to relocate Marine Corps Air Station Futenma from a densely
populated area of Okinawa encountered further obstacles in the first half of 2016.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is a strong supporter of the alliance and has had notable
success on his ambitious agenda to increase the capability and flexibility of Japan’s military.
Abe’s dominance over Japanese politics since his election in late 2012 has created opportunities
for more predictable alliance planning. However, constitutional, legal, fiscal, and political barriers
prevent a significant expansion of defense cooperation. Many of Abe’s initiatives have faced
opposition from the public and from political parties. In addition, leaders in China and South
Korea distrust Abe because of his past statements on Japanese actions in the World War II era.
Suspicion from Beijing and Seoul complicates Japan’s efforts to expand its security role.
Japan faces a complex security landscape in the region. North Korea’s increased asymmetric
capabilities pose a direct threat to Japan. A territorial dispute with China over a set of islets in the
East China Sea raises the risk of military escalation, a scenario that could trigger U.S. treaty
obligations to defend Japan. Japan has pursued security cooperation with others in the region,
including Australia, India, and several Southeast Asian countries. Of concern to the United States
is the tense Japan-South Korea relationship, which has prevented effective trilateral coordination.
Without cooperation among its allies, the United States may find itself less able to respond to
North Korean missile threats and to influence China’s behavior.
Both Japan and the United States face significant fiscal challenges. Limited resources could strain
alliance capabilities as well as produce more contentious negotiations on cost-sharing. The
Japanese government provides nearly $2 billion per year to offset the cost of stationing U.S.
forces in Japan.