Serbia: Background and U.S. Relations (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (20 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised Nov. 16, 2018 |
Report Number |
R44955 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Vincent L. Morelli |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Nov. 6, 2018 (20 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 17, 2018 (21 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 7, 2018 (21 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 7, 2018 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Jan. 4, 2018 (20 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 16, 2017 (19 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Sept. 19, 2017 (18 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
Following the conflicts in the late 1990s in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, the prospect of
membership in the Euro-Atlantic community and the active presence of the United States in the
Western Balkan region provided a level of stability that allowed most of the countries of the
region to pursue reform and adopt Western values. During this time, Slovenia and Croatia joined
the European Union (EU). These countries, along with Albania, also joined the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO). Montenegro became NATO’s 29 member on June 3, 2017. Other
nations of the Balkans are at various stages on the path toward EU or NATO membership.
However, many observers in Europe and the United States have been concerned that political
stability in the Western Balkans, sometimes referred to as Europe’s “inner courtyard,” remains
tenuous. Several of these countries have experienced governmental and political crises,
sometimes involving third-party interference, stagnating economies, high unemployment, and an
exodus of people from the region. These crises have raised cautions that the continuation of or
sudden increase in these factors could provide a vacuum in which outside political meddling,
transnational crime, radicalization, or terrorism could flourish.
At the center of the Balkans lies Serbia, which occupies a key strategic juncture at the social,
political, and geographic crossroads between Eastern and Western Europe. Despite difficult
historical relations with its neighbors, its ongoing dispute with Kosovo, recent concerns over its
commitment to democratic development, and the desire to balance its aspirations toward the West
with its historical ties to Russia, Serbia is seen by some as more stable politically than several of
its neighbors. Some also view Serbia as potentially the engine of economic growth for the entire
Balkan region. At the same time, others view Serbia as an important piece in the geostrategic
competition in the Western Balkans between the EU, the United States, and Russia.
U.S. relations with Serbia have been rocky at times, due to past U.S. interventions in the conflicts
in Bosnia and Kosovo and the U.S. recognition of Kosovo’s independence. Nevertheless,
relations between Washington and Belgrade seem to have improved recently, and today they
appear to be cordial. Between 2001 and 2017, the United States provided close to $800 million in
aid to Serbia to help stimulate economic growth, strengthen the justice system, and promote good
governance. Despite the U.S. disagreement with Serbia over Kosovo’s independence and the
mixed messages Washington believes Serbia sends over its relations with Moscow, the United
States continues to support Serbia’s efforts to join the EU. At the same time, the United States has
sought to strengthen its own relationship with Serbia through deepening cooperation based on
mutual interests and respect. Many Balkan watchers believe the EU’s commitment to further
integration of the Balkans, despite its declaratory support, has been distracted by the EU
migration crisis and the negotiations with the United Kingdom over its departure from the union.
These observers, in both Washington and the Balkans, believe the United States needs to
reinvigorate its former strategy of active engagement with the Western Balkans, and in particular
its relations with Serbia.
Congressional interest in Serbia (and Kosovo) dates to the 1991-1999 conflicts in the Western
Balkans. Over time, Congress has established Member caucuses on both Kosovo and Serbia and
has held several hearings on the Western Balkans. Recently, the Serb Caucus in the House noted
the 100 anniversary of Woodrow Wilson’s “day of prayer” for the people of Serbia. Many
Members support Kosovo’s independence, the efforts at reconciliation between Serbia and
Kosovo, and EU membership for both countries, but other Members have expressed skepticism
about Serbia’s relations with Russia or the future viability of the Serbia-Kosovo coexistence.
This report provides a brief overview of Serbia and U.S. relations with Belgrade.