FY2017 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriations: In Brief (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (15 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised May 11, 2017 |
Report Number |
R44441 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Jim Monke, Coordinator; Joel L. Greene; Agata Dabrowska; Randy Alison Aussenberg; Mark A. McMinimy |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised May 1, 2017 (15 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Dec. 20, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Oct. 11, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised Aug. 8, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised June 17, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Revised April 29, 2016 (14 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium March 31, 2016 (13 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
The Agriculture appropriations bill funds the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), except for
the Forest Service. It also funds the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and—in evennumbered
fiscal years—the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). (For CFTC, the
Agriculture appropriations subcommittee has jurisdiction in the House but not in the Senate.)
Agriculture appropriations include both mandatory and discretionary spending. Discretionary
amounts, though, are the primary focus during the bill’s development, since mandatory amounts
are generally set by authorizing laws such as the farm bill.
The largest discretionary spending items are the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); agricultural research; FDA; rural development; foreign
food aid and trade; farm assistance programs; food safety inspection; conservation; and animal
and plant health programs. The main mandatory spending items are the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP), child nutrition, crop insurance, and the farm commodity and
conservation programs paid by the Commodity Credit Corporation.
FY2017 has started under two continuing resolutions that last until April 28, 2017 (P.L. 114-254,
Division A). Both the House and the Senate Appropriations Committees had reported their
Agriculture appropriations bills (H.R. 5054, S. 2956), but no further action on them occurred.
The discretionary total of the FY2017 House-reported bill is $21.299 billion, which would be
$451 million less than enacted in FY2016. The discretionary total of the Senate-reported bill is
$21.250 billion. Although it appears less than the House bill, the Senate bill is $201 million more
than the House bill on a comparable basis after adjusting for CFTC jurisdiction. Both bills also
carry $126.4 billion of mandatory spending, bringing the overall total in excess of $147 billion.
In addition to setting budgetary amounts, the Agriculture appropriations bill also is a vehicle for
policy-related provisions that direct how the executive branch should carry out the appropriation.
Notable policy provisions in the FY2017 bills include:
GIPSA rule. The House-reported bill would prohibit the Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) from finalizing and
implementing a livestock and poultry marketing rule—the “GIPSA rule.”
Horse slaughter. Both bills would prohibit the Food Safety Inspection Service
(FSIS) from inspecting horse slaughter facilities.
Checkoff programs. The House report calls for USDA to recognize that
checkoff boards are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Tobacco products. The House-reported bill would grandfather all e-cigarettes
and other newly deemed tobacco products currently on the market so that
manufacturers would not have to file premarket applications.
SNAP-authorized retailers. Both bills would limit the scope of rules about
inventory requirements for SNAP-authorized retailers.
SNAP households reporting requirements. Both bills would require SNAP
households to report a move out of the state to the state agency.
School meals nutrition standards. The House-reported bill would again require
exemptions from a 100% whole grain requirement and prevent USDA from
implementing a sodium requirement without scientific evidence.
Export promotion office in Cuba. The Senate committee report recommends
funding a request to open a Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) office in Cuba.