Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

FY2017 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriations: In Brief (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (15 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised May 11, 2017
Report Number R44441
Report Type Report
Authors Jim Monke, Coordinator; Joel L. Greene; Agata Dabrowska; Randy Alison Aussenberg; Mark A. McMinimy
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   Revised May 1, 2017 (15 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 20, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 11, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 8, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 17, 2016 (17 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 29, 2016 (14 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   March 31, 2016 (13 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

The Agriculture appropriations bill funds the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), except for the Forest Service. It also funds the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and—in evennumbered fiscal years—the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). (For CFTC, the Agriculture appropriations subcommittee has jurisdiction in the House but not in the Senate.) Agriculture appropriations include both mandatory and discretionary spending. Discretionary amounts, though, are the primary focus during the bill’s development, since mandatory amounts are generally set by authorizing laws such as the farm bill. The largest discretionary spending items are the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC); agricultural research; FDA; rural development; foreign food aid and trade; farm assistance programs; food safety inspection; conservation; and animal and plant health programs. The main mandatory spending items are the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), child nutrition, crop insurance, and the farm commodity and conservation programs paid by the Commodity Credit Corporation. FY2017 has started under two continuing resolutions that last until April 28, 2017 (P.L. 114-254, Division A). Both the House and the Senate Appropriations Committees had reported their Agriculture appropriations bills (H.R. 5054, S. 2956), but no further action on them occurred. The discretionary total of the FY2017 House-reported bill is $21.299 billion, which would be $451 million less than enacted in FY2016. The discretionary total of the Senate-reported bill is $21.250 billion. Although it appears less than the House bill, the Senate bill is $201 million more than the House bill on a comparable basis after adjusting for CFTC jurisdiction. Both bills also carry $126.4 billion of mandatory spending, bringing the overall total in excess of $147 billion. In addition to setting budgetary amounts, the Agriculture appropriations bill also is a vehicle for policy-related provisions that direct how the executive branch should carry out the appropriation. Notable policy provisions in the FY2017 bills include:  GIPSA rule. The House-reported bill would prohibit the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) from finalizing and implementing a livestock and poultry marketing rule—the “GIPSA rule.”  Horse slaughter. Both bills would prohibit the Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) from inspecting horse slaughter facilities.  Checkoff programs. The House report calls for USDA to recognize that checkoff boards are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Tobacco products. The House-reported bill would grandfather all e-cigarettes and other newly deemed tobacco products currently on the market so that manufacturers would not have to file premarket applications.  SNAP-authorized retailers. Both bills would limit the scope of rules about inventory requirements for SNAP-authorized retailers.  SNAP households reporting requirements. Both bills would require SNAP households to report a move out of the state to the state agency.  School meals nutrition standards. The House-reported bill would again require exemptions from a 100% whole grain requirement and prevent USDA from implementing a sodium requirement without scientific evidence.  Export promotion office in Cuba. The Senate committee report recommends funding a request to open a Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) office in Cuba.