Labor Market Patterns Since 2007 (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (26 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Oct. 3, 2018 |
Report Number |
R45330 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Donovan, Sarah A.;Labonte, Marc |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Summary:
The period since 2007 has been a time of significant change for labor markets. The Great
Recession of 2007-2009, the longest and deepest recession since the Great Depression, caused
the unemployment rate to briefly reach 10%, and labor markets have subsequently experienced a
long and gradual recovery. Most labor force metrics, including the unemployment rate and
various other measures of labor force underutilization, have returned to levels that have
historically been consistent with full employment.
Labor Force Participation
One exception is the labor force participation rate (the ratio of workers who have a job or are
looking for a job to the overall adult population), which began declining before the Great
Recession and has only levelled off more recently. The decline in the labor force participation
rate is partly attributable to the aging of the population, particularly the retirement of the baby boomers. But even among
prime-age workers (age 25-54), participation is historically low for men and has only just rebounded for women from the
recession. Participation among young workers also fell sharply during the recession and has not fully rebounded. Economists
disagree about whether there will be further recovery in the participation rate; without further recovery, the economy will not
be able to continue adding jobs at recent rates.
Shifts in the Types of Jobs
Both the Great Recession and the continuation of longer-term structural changes have caused employment growth since 2007
to vary significantly by occupation and industry. Employment in goods-producing industries (such as manufacturing and
construction) was hardest hit by the recession and had still not recovered by 2017, whereas employment has grown in 9 out of
10 service-producing industries over that period. When viewed by occupation, employment growth since 2007 has been
concentrated in certain occupations with low median wages (food preparation and personal care) and high median wages
(healthcare practitioners, business and financial operations, computer and mathematical, and management), while the decline
in employment share has been concentrated in certain middle-wage occupations (production, office and administrative
support, and construction). This pattern has been referred to as the “hollowing out” or “polarization” of labor markets, and
has been attributed largely to technological change and globalization.
Outcomes for Demographic Groups
Employment outcomes vary widely across demographic groups. Employment rates have been persistently lower for young
workers, lower-educated workers, and black workers. In addition to changing opportunities for those workers, the Great
Recession hit those groups harder, with some lasting effects. Men were more likely than women to participate in the labor
force and be employed, but women’s employment rates rose relative to men’s over the 2000 to 2007 period. High
unemployment in male-dominated industries (construction and manufacturing) and low unemployment in female-dominated
industries (health care and education) contributed to relatively higher male unemployment during the recession. Although
unemployment rates for both sexes ultimate recovered, men’s labor force participation rates trended downward over the last
10 years while women’s were largely unchanged.
Looking Forward
Going forward, policymakers face several labor market challenges, including (1) accommodating the current tightness in
labor markets, while preparing for a return to recession at some point; (2) the continuing slowdown in the growth of the labor
force (from 1.4% between 1980 and 2000 to 0.6% between 2000 and 2015); (3) addressing the labor market impacts of
structural changes posed by technological change and globalization; and (4) a decline in labor market dynamism (e.g., fewer
workers switching jobs).