Banking Policy Issues in the 115th Congress (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (44 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
Release Date |
Revised March 7, 2018 |
Report Number |
R44855 |
Report Type |
Report |
Authors |
Perkins, David W. |
Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised May 26, 2017 (43 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium May 6, 2017 (43 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
T
he financial crisis and the ensuing legislative and regulatory responses
greatly affected the
banking industry
.
M
any new regulations
—
mandated
or authorized by the Dodd
-
Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(
P.L. 111
-
203
)
or
promu
lgated under
the authority of bank
regulators
—
have been implemented
in recent years
. In addition, econom
ic
and technological
trends
continue to
affect
banks.
As a result,
Congress
is
faced with many issues related to the
bank industry
, including
issues
con
cerning
prudential regulation
,
consumer protection
,
“
t
oo
b
ig
t
o
f
ail
”
(TBTF)
banks
,
community bank
s
,
regulatory agency
design and independence
,
and market
and economic
trends
.
For example,
t
he Financial CHOICE Act
(
H.R. 10
)
and the Economic
Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (
S. 2155
)
propose
wide ranging
changes
to the financial regulatory system, and include provisions related to many of these
bank
ing
issues.
Prudential
R
egulation
.
This type of regulation
is
design
ed to
ensure banks are safely profitable
and unlikely to fail.
R
egulatory ratio requirements
agreed to in the international agreement known
as the Basel III Accords
and the Volcker
R
ule
are examples
. Ratio requirements require banks to
hold a certain amount of capital
on their balance sheets
to
better
en
able
them
to
avoid failure
.
The
Volcker
R
ul
e prohibits certain trading activities and affiliations at banks.
Proponents argue the
rules appropriately balance the need for safety and soundness with regulatory burden. Opponents
argue that
current
rules are overly complex
,
unduly
burdensome
,
a
nd
d
ifficult
to enforce
.
Consumer
P
rotection
.
Certain
laws and regulations
protect
consumers from unfair, deceptive, or
abusive acts and practices.
R
egulation
s
promulgated by the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau (CFPB) and
certain mortgage lending rules
ar
e contentious issues in this area
. Observers
disagree over whether CFPB
authorities, structure,
regulations
, and enforcement actions
appropriate
ly
balance the benefit of protecting consumers and
the potential costs of unnecessarily
burdening banks and rest
ricting credit availability.
A s
imilar debate
is
about whether mortgage
rules appropriately protect consumers and effectively align certain market incentives
or
unnecessarily reduce the availability of mortgages
.
“
Too Big To Fail
”
Banks.
R
egulators
also re
gulate for systemic risk
s
,
such as those
associated
with
TBTF financial institutions
that
may
contribute to systemic instability
.
Dodd
-
Frank Act
provisions include
enhanced prudential regulation
for TBTF banks and changes to resolution
processes in the
event one failed
.
Proponents of these changes assert they will eliminate or reduce
excessive risk
-
taking
at
,
and
bailouts
for
,
these
large banks
.
Opponents
assert that market
forces
and bankruptcy law
are more effective and less distortionary than the
new
regula
tions
and
resolution authorities.
Community
B
anks
.
T
he number of
relatively small
banks
has declined substantially
in recent
decades.
Some analysts
assert
market forces
and
removal of regulatory barriers to interstate
branching and banking are having
a large effect
,
given
that
small banks are exempt from many
recent
regulations
and have been consolidating for decades
.
Others
assert small institutions have
limited resources and are being unnecessarily burdened by regulation, especially
because
such
ban
ks are unlikely to contribute to systemic risk.
Regulatory
A
gency
D
esign and
I
ndependence.
How
regulatory agencies
are structured
and
promulgate rules
are also issues
. Some assert
that
financial agencies
’
relatively high degree of
independence from the President and Congress results in too little accountability in rulemaking
;
thus,
their leadership structures, funding, and rulemaking procedures should be altered.
Opponents of such measures maintain that fi
nancial regulator independence should be maintained because it allows regulations to be promulgated by technical experts with s
ome
insulation from
political considerations.
Recent
M
arket and
E
conomic
T
rends
.
Changing economic forces
may also
pose issues to
the
banking industry. Increases in regulation could drive certain financial activi
ties into a relatively
lightly regulated
“
shadow banking
”
sector. Innovat
iv
e financial technology
may
alter the way
certain financial services are delivered. Interest rates
are likely to begin rising soon
after
a long
period of low rates
, which
could present risks to banks.
C
ompetition and regulatory differences
between
banks
and nonbanks with
different charter types is an ongoing issue.