"State Representation" in Appointments to Federal Circuit Courts (CRS Report for Congress)
Premium Purchase PDF for $24.95 (11 pages)
add to cart or
subscribe for unlimited access
Pro Premium subscribers have free access to our full library of CRS reports.
Subscribe today, or
request a demo to learn more.
| Release Date |
Revised March 30, 2011 |
| Report Number |
RS22510 |
| Report Type |
Report |
| Authors |
Susan Navarro Smelcer, Analyst on the Federal Judiciary; R. Sam Garrett, Analyst in American National Government |
| Source Agency |
Congressional Research Service |
| Older Revisions |
-
Premium Revised Sept. 4, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
-
Premium Jan. 24, 2007 (6 pages, $24.95)
add
|
Summary:
When a seat becomes vacant on a federal court of appeals (the "circuit courts"), the President has the opportunity to nominate a new judge for the Senate's consideration. Geography is often a factor in the decision, particularly whether the new judge will be nominated from the same state as the predecessor. One scholar refers to the custom of maintaining state continuity in seats within a court (e.g., a "Missouri seat" or an "Ohio seat") as "state representation." Federal statutes currently require that judges "reside" in the circuit at the time of appointment and while in active service, and that each state within the circuit be represented among the court's judges, but do not require that particular seats be reserved for nominees from particular states.
As of this writing, President Obama has nominated 23 individuals to circuit court judgeships (excluding nominations made to the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia) during the 111th and 112th Congresses. Of the 16 confirmed, only one â that of Albert Diaz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit â has resulted in a change in state representation. Of the seven whose nominations have not yet received final action, none would result in changes in state representation.
This report provides an overview and analysis of changes in state representation of circuit court judges confirmed since 1891, when Congress created the modern regional appeals courts. The data reveal that some seats are consistently filled by judges from the same state. Other seats are filled by judges from various states in that circuit. Overall, changes in state representation have occurred in 23% of confirmed nominations since 1891. Changes in state representation were more common prior to the 1960s than in recent decades. Over 40% of appointments made during the Kennedy Administration or earlier have resulted in changes to state representation in a circuit; 13% of circuit court appointments after the Kennedy Administration have made such a change. The frequency of those changes has also varied by circuit.
This report will be updated periodically to reflect changes in state representation or other notable developments.
