Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Civil Penalties

  Premium   Download PDF Now (4 pages)
Report Type Federal Agency Major Rule Reports
Report Date Aug. 19, 2019
Release Date Aug. 19, 2019
Report No. B-331267
Summary:
Highlights

GAO reviewed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) new rule on civil penalties. GAO found that the final rule confirms the determination NHTSA announced in the notice of proposed rulemaking that the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015 does not apply to the civil penalty rate applicable to automobile manufacturers that fail to meet applicable corporate average fuel economy standards and are unable to offset such a deficit with compliance credits.







View Decision

B-331267
August 7, 2019
The Honorable Roger F. Wicker
Chairman
The Honorable Maria Cantwell
Ranking Member
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
United States Senate
The Honorable Jerrold Nadler
Chairman
The Honorable Doug Collins
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary
House of Representatives
Subject:
Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Civil
Penalties
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States
Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Transportation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) entitled ?Civil Penalties? (RIN:
2127-AL94).  We received the rule on July 26, 2019.  It was published in the
Federal Register as a final rule on July 26, 2019.  84 Fed. Reg. 36007. 
The effective date of the rule is September 24, 2019.
The final rule, according to NHTSA, confirms the
determination NHTSA announced in the notice of proposed rulemaking that the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015 (Inflation Adjustment Act) does not apply to the
civil penalty rate applicable to automobile manufacturers that fail to meet applicable
corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards and are unable to offset such a deficit
with compliance credits.  In addition, according to NHTSA, this final rule is
finalizing NHTSA?s determination that even if the Inflation Adjustment Act applies,
increasing the CAFE civil penalty rate would have a negative economic impact, and
therefore, in accordance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1965 and the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007, the current CAFE civil penalty rate of $5.50 should
be retained, instead of an increase to $14 in model year 2019.
Enclosed is our assessment of NHTSA?s compliance with the
procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect
to the rule.  If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO
officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule,
please contact Janet Temko-Blinder, Assistant General Counsel, at (202)
512-7104.
  signed
Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc:
Michael Kuppersmith
Trial Attorney, Litigation and Enforcement
Department of TransportationENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A
MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
Department of Transportation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
ENTITLED
?CIVIL PENALTIES? (RIN: 2127-AL94)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), stated that this final rule is a deregulatory action and reported the potential
economic impacts in the final rule.  According to NHTSA, if the corporate average fuel
economy (CAFE) civil penalty rate is increased from $5.50 to $14, the projected additional
penalties through 2026 is $7,171,193,263.09 under augural standards and $2,759,359,238.58
under proposed standards.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. §§
603-605, 607, and 609
NHTSA certified that this final rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535
NHTSA determined that this final rule does not include a federal mandate likely to
result in the expenditure by state, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by
the private sector, of more than $100 million annually.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive
orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551et seq.
On April 2, 2018, NHTSA published a proposed rule.  83 Fed. Reg. 13904.  NHSTA
stated that it received 16 comments.  NHSTA responded to comments in the final
rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520
NHTSA found that there are no requirements for information collection associated with
this final rule.
Statutory authorization for the rule
NHTSA determined this final rule was promulgated pursuant to Pub. L. No. 101-410, 104
Stat. 890; Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321; Pub L. No. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; Pub. L.
No. 114-74, 129 Stat. 584; Pub L. No. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312; 49 U.S.C. §§ 30165, 30170,
30505, 32308, 32309, 32507, 32709, 32710, 32902, 32912, and 33115; and delegation of
authority at 49 C.F.R. 1.81 and 1.95.
Executive Order No. 12,866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
NHTSA stated that this final rule is economically significant under the Order and that
this final rule was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
NHTSA determined that this final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.




Downloads





Full Report (4 pages)

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports