LegiStorm

Summary:
Highlights

GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) new rule on the Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule. GAO found that the final rule revises the technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating point source category applicable to flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater and bottom ash transport water.







View Decision

B-332608
October 26, 2020
The Honorable John Barrasso
Chairman
The Honorable Thomas R. Carper
Ranking Member
Committee on Environment and Public Works
United States Senate
The Honorable Frank Pallone, Jr.
Chairman
The Honorable Greg Walden
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives
Subject:
Environmental Protection Agency: Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States
Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) entitled ?Steam Electric Reconsideration Rule? (RIN: 2040-AF77).  We received
the rule on September 4, 2020.  It was published in the Federal Register as a
final rule on October 13, 2020.  85 Fed. Reg. 64650.  The rule has an effective
date of December 14, 2020.
According to EPA, the final rule revises the technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and
standards for the steam electric power generating point source category applicable to flue
gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater and bottom ash transport water.  EPA states
participation in the voluntary incentive program would contribute to the reduction in
pollutant discharges by these steam electric power plants in FGD wastewater by
approximately 26.7 million pounds per year.
Enclosed is our assessment of EPA?s compliance with the
procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect
to the rule.  If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO
officials responsible for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule,
please contact Shari Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-6398.

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc:  Mary Manibusan
Director, Regulatory Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
ENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A
MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
environmental protection agency
ENTITLED
?STEAM ELECTRIC RECONSIDERATION RULE? (RIN: 2040-AF77)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that the final rule will save
$127 million per year in social costs and result in between $?1.7 million and $43 million
in benefits, using a 3 percent discount rate, and will save $153 million per year in
social costs and between $6.5 million and $46 million in benefits, using a 7 percent
discount rate.  EPA also stated the final rule would lead to non-monetized benefits
such as changes in bladder cancer incidence and other human health effects associated with
changes in drinking water disinfection byproduct levels; changes in ecosystem, visibility,
and human health effects due to direct exposure to nitrogen oxides, hazardous air
pollutants, and sulfur dioxide air emissions; changes in certain non-cancer human health
risks (for example,effects of cadmium on kidney functions and bone density); impacts of
pollutant discharge changes on threatened and endangered species; and ash marketability
changes.  According to EPA, the Benefit and Cost Analysis report discusses changes in
these effects qualitatively and indicates their potential magnitude where
possible.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. §§
603-605, 607, and 609
EPA certified the final rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535
EPA determined the final rule is not subject to the Act because the expenditures in any
one year are less than the $160 million threshold.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive
orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
On November 22, 2019, EPA published a proposed rule.  84 Fed. Reg. 64620.  EPA
received more than 7,400 public comment submissions from private citizens, industry
members, technology vendors, government entities, environmental groups, and trade
associations.  EPA also hosted an online public hearing on December 19, 2019 (during
the public comment period).  The hearing had 110 attendees, 32 of whom spoke about the
proposed rule.  EPA responded to the comments in the final rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520
EPA determined the final rule modifies existing information collection requirements
(ICRs) previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  The ICRs are
associated with OMB Control Number 2040-0004.  EPA estimated the final rule would lead
to no net change in the cost burden of the ICR, so EPA did not submit the changes to OMB
for review under the Act.
Statutory authorization for the rule
EPA promulgated the final rule pursuant to sections 1251 1311, 1314, 1316, 1317,
1318, and 1361 of title 33, United States Code.
Executive Order No. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
EPA stated the final rule was economically significant and submitted the rule to OMB for
review.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
EPA determined the final rule does not have federalism implications.  EPA
stated it will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.




Downloads





Full Report (3 pages)