Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and Human Services: Transparency in Coverage

  Premium   Download PDF Now (4 pages)
Report Type Federal Agency Major Rule Reports
Report Date Dec. 15, 2020
Release Date Dec. 15, 2020
Report No. B-332712
Summary:
Highlights

GAO reviewed the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and Human Services's (the Departments) new rule entitled "Transparency in Coverage." GAO found that the final rule (1) sets forth requirements for group health plans and health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets to disclose cost-sharing information upon request to a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee (or his or her authorized representative), including an estimate of the individual's cost-sharing liability for covered items or services furnished by a particular provider; and (2) requires plans and issuers to disclose in-network provider negotiated rates, historical out-of-network allowed amounts, and drug pricing information through three machine-readable files posted on an internet website, thereby allowing the public to have access to health coverage information that can be used to understand health care pricing and potentially dampen the rise in health care spending.







View Decision

B-332712
November 24, 2020
The Honorable Chuck Grassley
Chairman
The Honorable Ron Wyden
Ranking Member
Committee on Finance
United States Senate
The Honorable Frank Pallone, Jr.
Chairman
The Honorable Greg Walden
Ranking Member
Committee on Energy and Commerce
House of Representatives
The Honorable Richard Neal
Chairman
The Honorable Kevin Brady
Ranking Member
Committee on Ways and Means
House of Representatives
Subject: Department of the Treasury,
Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor,Employee Benefits Security
Administration; Department of Health and Human Services: Transparency in Coverage
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a
major rule promulgated by the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service;
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and
Human Services (the Departments) entitled ?Transparency in Coverage? (RINs: 1545-BP47;
1210-AB93; 0938?AU04).  We received the rule on November 4, 2020.  It was
published in the Federal Register as a final rule on November 12, 2020.  85
Fed. Reg. 72158.  The effective date of the final rule is January 11, 2021. 
According to the Departments, the final rule sets forth requirements for group health
plans and health insurance issuers in the individual and group markets to disclose
cost-sharing information upon request to a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee (or his or
her authorized representative), including an estimate of the individual?s cost-sharing
liability for covered items or services furnished by a particular provider.  The
Departments stated, under the final rule, plans and issuers are required to make this
information available on an internet website and, if requested, in paper form, thereby
allowing a participant, beneficiary, or enrollee (or his or her authorized representative)
to obtain an estimate and understanding of the individual?s out-of-pocket expenses and
effectively shop for items and services.  The Departments stated further, the final
rule also requires plans and issuers to disclose in-network provider negotiated rates,
historical out-of-network allowed amounts, and drug pricing information through three
machine-readable files posted on an internet website, thereby allowing the public to have
access to health coverage information that can be used to understand health care pricing
and potentially dampen the rise in health care spending.  The Departments noted, the
Department of Health and Human Services is also finalizing amendments to its medical loss
ratio (MLR) program rules to allow issuers offering group or individual health insurance
coverage to receive credit in their MLR calculations for savings they share with enrollees
that result from the enrollees shopping for, and receiving care from, lower-cost,
higher-value providers.
Enclosed is our assessment of the Departments? compliance with the procedural steps
required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. 
If you have any questions about this report or wish to contact GAO officials responsible
for the evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule, please contact Shari
Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-6398.

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Enclosure
cc:  Vanessa Jones
Regulations Coordinator
Department of Health and Human Services
Carrie E. Mudd
Director, Legal Processing Division

Jeanne Klinefelter Wilson
Acting Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration
Department of Labor
ENCLOSURE
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. § 801(a)(2)(A) ON A
MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
 Internal Revenue Service;
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security
Administration;
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ENTITLED (RIN:
1545?BP47; 1210?AB93; 0938?AU04)
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; Department of Labor, Employee
Benefits Security Administration; Department of Health and Human Services (the Departments)
conducted an economic impact analysis.  This analysis included a statement of need;
overall impact; regulatory review costs; and regulatory alternatives considered.  The
Departments stated that the benefits of the final rule include potential societal resource
savings (non-quantified efficiency portion of any overall reduction in consumer health care
expenditures) and potential to reduce the cost of surprise billing to consumers.  The
Departments stated further that they estimate the annualized monetary cost to be $4,047.7
million to $5,472.4 million from 2021 through 2025.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. §§
603-605, 607, and 609
The Departments stated that the final rule will not have a significant impact on any
entity subject to the final rules including small entities.  The Departments stated
further that the final rule will not have a significant impact on the operations of a
substantial number of small rural hospitals.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. §§ 1532-1535
The Departments stated the final rule includes instructions for disclosures that would
affect private sector firms, but that they expect the combined impact on state, local, and
tribal governments to be below the threshold of $156 million ($100 million, adjusted for
inflation), or more.  The Departments also stated they recognize that due to the size
and complexity of the machine-readable files required by the final rule, some states will
incur increased burdens and costs to review and ensure compliance with the requirements in
the final rule.  The Departments stated further that, at this time, they do not have
available funding to provide grants to assist states in their efforts.  The
Departments noted that they will consider and evaluate the potential necessity to provide
grants to assist states in their efforts should a significant need arise.  The
Departments stated they expect that a number of states with the requisite authority to
enforce the provisions of the final rule may defer enforcement to federal regulators
because of a lack of funds.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive
orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
On November 27, 2019, the Departments published a proposed rule entitled Transparency
in Coverage, 84 Fed. Reg. 65464 (Proposed Rules).  The Departments stated that
they received over 25,000 comments in response to the Proposed Rules from a range of
stakeholders, including plans and issuers, health care providers, prescription drug
companies, employers, state regulators, health IT companies, health care policy
organizations and think tanks, and individuals.  The Departments noted that it
received a number of comments and suggestions that were outside the scope of the proposed
rules that are not addressed in the final rule (for example, regarding hospital prices,
other methods for reducing health care and prescription drug costs, consumer education and
provider directories).  The Departments asserted that they carefully considered the
comments and they are finalizing the Proposed Rules with certain modifications made in
response to comments.  The comments and modifications are discussed in the preamble of
the final rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. §§ 3501-3520
The Departments determined that the final rule contains information collection
requirements (ICRs) under the Act.  Some ICRs in the final rule are currently approved
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).  The ICRs submitted for approval to OMB
are associated with CMS-10715?Transparency in Coverage (OMB Control Number
0938-1372).  The Departments note that high-end 3-year estimated values were used to
determine the overall estimated 3-year average of annual burden estimates.  The
Departments estimate the total annual burden hours for the ICRs to be 57,210,971 hours and
the total cost to be $7,981,977,844.10.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The Departments promulgated the final rule pursuant to sections 7805 and 9833 of title
26, United States Code; sections 1135, 1185d, and 1191c of title 29, United States Code;
and sections 300gg to 300gg-63, 300gg-91, 300gg-92, and 300gg-94 of title 42, United States
Code.
Executive Order No. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
The Departments determined that the final rule is economically significant under the
Order and stated the rule was reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order No. 13132 (Federalism)
The Departments stated that the final rule may have federalism implications.  The
Departments stated further that they have engaged in efforts to consult with and work
cooperatively with affected states, including participating in conference calls with and
attending conferences for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and
consulting with state insurance officials on an individual basis.  The Departments
noted they attempted to balance the states' interests in regulating issuers with Congress's
intent to provide an improved level of price transparency to the public in every state.




Downloads





Full Report (4 pages)

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports